太和县局重点信访案件汇报材料

关图书

《安徽太和县文件汇编3: 上级交办信访重点案件》

相关链接

全省公安机关开展重点信访案件专项治理工作方案

全县公安机关重点信访案件专项治理工作方案

重点信访案件包案登记表  

关于2月8日会议精神落实情况的汇报材料

太和县局重点信访案件汇报材料

重点信访案件专项治理上级交办案件办理情况登记

各位领导

 2011年12月20日,市局发出《关于认真做好汇报重点信访案件办理情况的通知》,我局接通知后,迅速行动起来,对相关信访案件认真梳理、研究,并制定切实可行的化解、工作方案,要求办访部门领导高度重视,全力工作,能化解的尽快化解,短期不能化解的,依法查明案件事实,找准解决思路和办法,争取尽快结案。目前,我局重点信访案件办理进展顺利,上级交办我局重点信访案件12件(其中中政委交办1件,公安部交办10件,公安厅交办1件),已报结6件,办结率50%。现将部分事项办理情况汇报如下:

一、高炯信访事项的办理情况

(一)信访人基本情况

高炯,男,汉族,43岁,住太和县城关镇太亳路22号88户,系犯罪嫌疑人高天甲之父。

    (二)信访事项

信访人要求查清案件事实、重新鉴定吕静的伤情、惩治违法办案人员的法律责任,还高天甲清白。

(三)案件办理情况

经查2008年01月21日14时许, 太和城关镇李营村民李建发与高炯(高天甲的父亲)在太和县城关镇关北社区长征路与友谊路交叉口西北处因租沙子场地发生争吵,过程中相互殴打,高天甲将吕静打伤,经法医鉴定,吕静的人体损伤程度为轻伤(检验情况:被鉴定人吕静额部缝合创长约5cm),高炯、高天甲对吕静伤情鉴定结论不服,要求重新鉴定。2008年5月26日,阜阳市公安局(阜)公(法)鉴复字【2008】049号鉴定结论:“吕静额部损伤程度属轻伤”。高炯、高天甲对吕静伤情复核鉴定结论仍不服。2009年1月20日,犯罪嫌疑人高天甲到城北派出所投案,当日我局依法对高天甲取保候审,高炯、高天甲再次申请对吕静的伤情进行重新鉴定,报请局领导审批,我局委托安徽省立医院对吕静的伤情作医学鉴定。2009年3月12日,安徽省立医院复函:“有关专家审核材料后认为该鉴定属于法医物证鉴定,不属于我院人身伤害医学鉴定范围。”2009年7月,高炯、高天甲要求到省公安厅刑警总队法医科对吕静的伤情作法医鉴定。2009年7月2日,我局在征得受害人吕静和犯罪嫌疑人高天甲的同意后委托安徽省公安厅对吕静的伤情法医鉴定。2009年7月26日,省公安厅刑警总队法医科鉴定结论为:“被鉴定人吕静额部损伤程度属轻伤。”至此,高炯、高天甲仍然不服,要求到公安部对吕静的伤情重新鉴定,我局决定不予重新鉴定。

2009年2月9日,我局将此案移送起诉至太和县人民检察院。2009年10月14日太和县人民法院以“(2009)太刑初字第210号逮捕决定书”对犯罪嫌疑人高天甲决定逮捕。但高天甲未能按时到案,致使本案无法正常审理。2009年10月21日,太和县人民法院函告太和县人民检察院“(2009)太刑初字第210号逮捕决定书”不再执行,此案退回太和县人民检察院。同日,太和县人民检察院将此案退回我局。2009年11月27日,我局决定对高天甲刑事拘留,2011年11月29日对高天甲执行拘留。2011年12月14日我局将该案移送太和县人民检察院审查起诉,2012年1月20日,太和县人民法院一审判决:判处高天甲有期徒刑1年,缓刑2年。高天甲、高炯未提起上诉。2012年2月7日,我局对高炯回访,高炯表示对判决无异议,未上诉,判决已经生效。

二、于斌信访事项的办理情况

  (一)信访人基本情况

    于斌,男,汉族,40岁,住太和县城关镇文明5号407室。

  (二)信访事项

    信访人反映被从网上诈骗3000元。

  (三)事项办理情况

经查,2011年2月28日,太和县城关镇居民于斌在网上与无锡泽君商贸公司达成购货合同,购买二手五菱之光汽车一辆,于斌通过农业银行给对方汇款,于斌将3000元货款发出后约十分钟,该款被人从常熟市农业银行取走。对方并未发货,于斌感觉被骗,2011年3月25日,于斌到我局反映,我局及时告知其此案不属我局管辖,应向江苏警方报案。于斌向江苏警方报案,江苏警方以查无此公司为由未受理,为此于斌7月7日致信公安部信访。

近期,我局多次与于斌联系约谈,于斌因忙于生意未能如约与我局民警见面。春节前后,我局多次联系于斌均未见到,于斌称有空会主动到公安局见面。

三、张庆海信访事项的办理情况

  (一)信访人基本情况

张庆海,男,76岁,住太和县旧县镇三角元村委会小卢庄自然村118号。1986年之前,张庆海曾担任五星水管站站长一职直至退休。

  (二)信访人主要诉求

张庆海投信反映双浮镇居民王家斌、王亚伟、王伟涛兄弟三人侵占五星水管站的土地并毁坏财物,要求公安机关依法处理。

  (三)涉访事项和核查办理情况

经查,2006年上半年,双浮居民王亚伟、王伟涛、王家斌等人所建三层楼房与五星水管站相邻,张庆海在事后得知建房一事。随后向有关部门提出以上诉求。

五星水管站与王家斌等人建房的土地原全属于双浮区拖拉机站。后经撤区建乡,双浮区拖拉机站所占土地一分为二,东面属于双浮镇小张庄,西面(即五星水管站)属于五星王小庄。后王家斌父亲王永华从双浮镇小张庄居民张正山、张正奎、张正东手中购买东面半部分的土地(附:土地转让协议)。

王家斌等人建房时因挖地基夯实地面时,导致五星水管站东面一间房屋坍塌。经调查未发现强行扒房行为。

对该产权纠纷,太和县水利局向人民法院提起诉讼,1998年7月1日,太和县人民法院驳回太和县水利局的起诉。法院认为:双方争议的土地双方均未有合法的权属证明,系权属不明,依法应由行政机关(土地管理部门)解决,不属人民法院受案范围(附:法院民事裁定书)。

张庆海曾报警至我局五星派出所,五星派出所民警出警当场调解未果,后期张庆海多次到我局反映,我局经调查,认定张庆海诉称五星水管站及地面附着物被王亚伟等人损毁的行为不构成违法,属于一般土地纠纷,我局已依法告知当事人。

我局决心力促双方达成和解。张庆海的儿子张彬在我局旧县派出所工作,我局通过张彬做其父亲的思想工作。王亚伟等人通过镇政府、双浮知名人士多方协调,张庆海同意有条件息访,王亚伟等人愿给予五星水管站职工1-2万元的经济补偿,张庆海与王亚伟等初步达成协议。

四、张淑琴信访事项的办理情况

   (一)信访人基本情况

    信访人张淑琴,女,52岁,务农,原籍安徽太和县,2002年将全家户口迁往黑龙江,现住黑龙江省呼玛县呼玛镇。

(二)信访事项

 信访人张淑琴于2011年7月7日寄信至公安部,要求追究张杰、张峰、金翠荣、孙连芳等人刑事责任及相关办案部门人员责任。

   (三)信访事项办理情况

    经查,1998年12月24日,太和县税镇镇张大庄人张杰将同村村民张磊打死后潜逃。2006年12月25日,我局将张杰抓获,后该张杰被判处无期徒刑。

    我局对该案相关人员进行调查,于1998年12月24日对张峰立案侦查,1998年12月28日,我局批准对张峰刑事拘留,2000年10月16日张峰到我局投案自首,同月18日被我局取保候审,2001年10月16日解除取保;同时,于2007年1月24日、3月24日分别对涉嫌包庇罪的张杰母亲孙连芳、妻子金翠荣立案侦查。2007年4月17日将孙连芳、金翠荣、张峰等三人提请检察院逮捕,同年4月26日孙连芳、张峰因涉嫌窝藏罪被太和县检察院批准逮捕,对金翠荣不捕。2007年4月29日,孙连芳因患有严重疾病被我局取保候审,5月14日,张峰因不至于发生社会危险性被我局取保候审。2007年5月24日,我局将孙连芳、张峰起诉。该案起诉后,经两次退查,太和县人民检察院于2007年10月24日函告我局:“认定犯罪嫌疑人张峰犯有窝藏罪的事实不清、证据不足,经本院检委会2007年10月24日研究,决定将张峰一案退回你局进一步查证后依法处理。”2007年11月29日太和县人民检察院函告我局:“卷中认定犯罪嫌疑人孙连芳犯有窝藏罪主观故意及客观行为方面的事实不清、证据不足,经本院检委会2007年11月28日研究,决定将孙连芳一案退回你局处理。”经我局局务会于2007年12月5日研究决定对孙连芳、张峰继续执行取保候审。2008年4月24日,孙连芳、张峰因取保候审期限即将届满被我局解除取保候审。张淑琴要求判处张杰死刑,并追究张峰、金翠荣、孙连芳等人涉嫌包庇的刑事责任。不服法院判决和检察机关对张峰等三人不构成犯罪的认定,多处上访。

    因张淑琴户籍已于2002年迁至黑龙江省呼玛县呼玛镇,经常在北京地区活动,无法联系和回访。

五、赵秀玲信访事项

(一)信访人基本情况

赵秀玲,女,53岁,住太和县蔡庙镇刘新宇村,务农。

 (二)信访事项

1997年3月,其一家三口被人投毒,致使其女儿死亡,儿子和丈夫留下后遗症,要求公安机关依法查处,政府给予适当照顾。

 (三)案件办理情况

   1、案件基本情况

1997年3月13日(农历二月初五)上午,赵秀玲丈夫刘从德、儿子刘保险、女儿刘艳凤三人在家吃韭菜馅的饺子,下午1:40左右,刘保险、刘艳凤到学校上课,3点钟二人感到头晕,不大厉害,4点钟下课回家后,刘艳凤感觉头痛发热,到本村刘善英处看病,开点退烧药,晚上六、七点钟的样子,刘保险做饭,刘艳凤烧锅溜馍,炒的萝卜菜,饭后二人做作业到九点多钟,十点多钟睡的觉,夜里刘保险拉肚子难受,第二天早晨起床又到本村刘善英处看病,没看出啥病。回家后,刘艳凤手脚开始抽动不能动弹,三人一块到中医院看病,到中医院后,三人都出现中毒症状。过了十来天(1997年3月24日)刘艳凤因抢救无效死亡。后赵秀玲到蔡庙刑警中队报案,中队及时开展工作。

2、案件办理情况

我局刑警大队技术中队法医于1997年3月31日将赵秀玲家厨房的水、剩菜、粗盐及堂屋的鼠药共6份送到阜阳市卫生防疫站进行毒物分析。结果是:桶中水呈阴性,其余检材均为阳性。

案发后,刑警大队成立专案组,及时进驻蔡庙开展工作,专案组民警到赵秀玲家人及案发地走访,询问受害人赵秀玲、刘保险、刘从德,根据赵秀玲、刘从德提供的情况,怀疑其本村的刘青有重大作案嫌疑。经查:案发的前两天(九七年农历正月初三),刘从德和刘青一块到赵庙镇张楼姥娘家拜年,中午二人均喝多了,到天黑两人才往回赶,途中,刘从德又到赵庙镇蒋庄其表姐家,刘青到家后告诉赵秀玲说刘从德喝多了回不来了,后赵秀玲让刘青和其一块去找刘从德,途中,刘青提出要与赵秀玲发生性关系,赵秀玲没有同意。第二天,刘青因给本村的“梅”介绍男朋友,与刘从德的儿子刘保险发生厮打后被邻居劝开,刘青扬言要杀死刘从德全家。经询问刘青以及其活动情况,没有证据证明其作案。后刘青出走,至今未归。

2008年2月25日,赵秀玲到蔡庙中队反映刘青在马鞍山张西孔家。经查,张西孔系马鞍山钢铁公司工会主席,其两个女儿都在马鞍山钢铁公司工作,经询问刘青大姐刘翠芳、二姐刘翠荣、三姐刘翠英、刘青走后十多年没有和家人联系过,经查询刘翠芳、刘翠荣两家电话号,均未发现嫌疑情况。

  (四)近期工作情况

我局刑警大队专案组并采取以下措施:1、向嫌疑人刘青亲属发放规劝通知书,告知利害关系;2、话单分析及周围邮电所查询包裹或寄信情况;3、利用特情及时掌握信息;4、对外出打工地点进行布控;5、落实一包三定,考虑其实际生活困难为其解决低保。6、定期对赵秀玲进行回访,加强疏导、解释工作。

近年来,我局积极向党委政府汇报,按规定为赵秀玲一家办理最低生活保障金。我局民警经常为赵秀玲家农业生产提供帮助。我局民警2011年8月10日回访了赵秀玲,赵秀玲表示理解公安机关的工作难度。2011年12月,县政法委副书记刘新生组织相关部门召开赵秀玲信访事项研究会,会议决定由蔡庙镇领导出面协调,其他部门协助,围绕赵秀玲主要亲属开展工作,从经济救助方面努力化解。

2012年1月11日上午,市局专家组专门研究赵秀玲信访事项,市局王东喜副局长、冯玉光副书记、王明华副局长及市局法制、信访、刑侦等部门和攻坚、评查两个办公室负责同志参加,经过认真分析、研究认为:一、该案是中政委交办的,是重点案件中的重点案件。二、破案几乎不可能,重点考虑经济救助。一次性救助10万元以下可以考虑,可以分批数次支付。因可能出现物价上涨因素,为避免今后纠缠,不考虑按月付款方式。三、化解之前继续做好稳控工作。

2012年1月20日,我局安排蔡庙派出所所长孙献宝代表公安局看望慰问赵秀玲及家人,送去慰问金200元。同时,蔡庙镇党委、政府和村委会也送去慰问金各100元。

春节期间,我局领导和法制信访部门多次和赵秀玲谈话,并通过赵的亲属做其工作。近日,我局计划结合“三访三评” 活动设法积极化解该事项。

六、友谊路72户居民信访事项的基本情况

(一)信访人基本情况

友谊路72户居民,系我局家属院居民。

(二)信访事项

反映百太豪景开发商开发楼盘影响居民小区采光及侵占居民区公共土地事项并在纠纷中伤害无辜。

(三)事项办理情况

我局家属院东临百太豪景小区,因相邻院墙改造,我局家属院居民与太豪景开发商发生纠纷,此事项因涉及我局干警及其家属,县领导安排由太和县政法委牵头调查,经政法委协调,双方已就纠纷事项初步达成和解意向。

 Taihe County Bureau’s key petition case report materials

related books

“Compilation of Documents of Taihe County, Anhui 3: Key Cases of Complaints and Visits Assigned by Superiors”

Related Links

The province’s public security organs carry out special treatment work plans for key petition cases

The special treatment work plan for key petition cases of public security organs in the county

Key petition case package registration form

Reporting materials on the implementation of the spirit of the meeting on February 8

Taihe County Bureau’s key petition case report materials

Leaders:

  On December 20, 2011, the Municipal Bureau issued the “Notice on Seriously Reporting the Handling of Key Petition Cases”. After receiving the notice, our bureau acted quickly to sort out and study related petition cases and formulate practical solutions , work plan, requires the leaders of the visiting department to attach great importance to it, work hard, resolve it as soon as possible, and if it cannot be resolved in the short term, find out the facts of the case in accordance with the law, find out the solution ideas and methods, and strive to close the case as soon as possible. At present, the handling of key letters and visits cases of our bureau is progressing smoothly. The superiors have assigned 12 key letters and visits cases of our bureau (including 1 case assigned by the Central Political Committee, 10 cases assigned by the Ministry of Public Security, and 1 case assigned by the Public Security Department). 50%. The status of some matters is reported as follows:

1. Handling of Gao Jiong’s letters and visits

(1) Basic information of petitioners

Gao Jiong, male, Han nationality, 43 years old, lives in Household 88, No. 22, Taibo Road, Chengguan Town, Taihe County, and is the father of the criminal suspect Gao Tianjia.

     (2) Letters and visits

The petitioner asked to find out the facts of the case, re-appraise Lu Jing’s injury, punish the legal responsibilities of those who handled the case illegally, and return Gao Tianjia’s innocence.

(3) Handling of cases

After investigation, at 14:00 on January 21, 2008, Li Jianfa, a villager in Liying, Chengguan Town, Taihe, and Gao Jiong (Gao Tianjia’s father) rented sand in the northwest of the intersection of Changzheng Road and Youyi Road, Guanbei Community, Chengguan Town, Taihe County. There was a quarrel in the field, and they beat each other during the process. Gao Tianjia injured Lv Jing. According to the forensic medical examination, the degree of injury to Lv Jing’s body was minor (examination: the suture wound on the forehead of the appraised person was about 5cm long), Gao Jiong, Gao Tianjia Dissatisfied with the conclusion of the appraisal of Lu Jing’s injury, he demanded a new appraisal. On May 26, 2008, Fuyang City Public Security Bureau (Fu) Gong (Fa) Jian Fu Zi [2008] No. 049 appraisal conclusion: “The degree of injury to Lu Jing’s forehead is a minor injury.” Gao Jiong and Gao Tianjia still disagree with the conclusion of Lu Jing’s injury review. On January 20, 2009, the criminal suspect Gao Tianjia surrendered to the Chengbei Police Station. On that day, our bureau released Gao Tianjia on bail pending trial. The provincial hospital made a medical appraisal of Lu Jing’s injury. On March 12, 2009, Anhui Provincial Hospital replied: “After reviewing the materials, relevant experts believe that the appraisal belongs to forensic physical evidence appraisal, and does not belong to the scope of personal injury medical appraisal of our hospital.” In July 2009, Gao Jiong and Gao Tianjia requested to come The Forensic Medicine Section of the Criminal Police Corps of the Provincial Public Security Department made a forensic medical appraisal of Lu Jing’s injuries. On July 2, 2009, after obtaining the consent of the victim Lu Jing and the criminal suspect Gao Tianjia, our bureau entrusted the Anhui Provincial Public Security Bureau to conduct a forensic appraisal of Lu Jing’s injuries. On July 26, 2009, the forensic department of the Criminal Police Corps of the Provincial Public Security Department concluded that: “The degree of injury to the appraised person Lu Jing’s forehead is a minor injury.” However, the Bureau decided not to re-appraise the situation.

On February 9, 2009, our bureau transferred the case to Taihe County People’s Procuratorate for prosecution. On October 14, 2009, the Taihe County People’s Court decided to arrest the criminal suspect Gao Tianjia with the “(2009) Tai Xing Chu Zi No. 210 Arrest Decision”. However, Gao Tianjia failed to arrive at the case on time, which made the case unable to be heard normally. On October 21, 2009, the Taihe County People’s Court informed the Taihe County People’s Procuratorate that the “(2009) Tai Xing Chu Zi No. 210 Arrest Decision” should not be executed, and the case was returned to the Taihe County People’s Procuratorate. On the same day, Taihe County People’s Procuratorate returned the case to our bureau. On November 27, 2009, our bureau decided to criminally detain Gao Tianjia, and on November 29, 2011, Gao Tianjia was detained. On December 14, 2011, our bureau transferred the case to the Taihe County People’s Procuratorate for review and prosecution. On January 20, 2012, the Taihe County People’s Court made the first-instance verdict: Gao Tianjia was sentenced to 1 year in prison, suspended for 2 years. Gao Tianjia and Gao Jiong did not file an appeal. On February 7, 2012, our bureau paid a return visit to Gao Jiong. Gao Jiong stated that he had no objection to the verdict, did not appeal, and the verdict had come into effect.

2. Handling of Yu Bin’s letters and visits

   (1) Basic information of petitioners

     Yu Bin, male, Han nationality, 40 years old, lived in Room 407, No. 5 Wenming, Chengguan Town, Taihe County.

   (2) Letters and visits

     The petitioner reported being defrauded of 3,000 yuan from the Internet.

   (3) Matters handled

After investigation, on February 28, 2011, Yu Bin, a resident of Chengguan Town, Taihe County, reached a purchase contract with Wuxi Zejun Trading Company on the Internet to purchase a second-hand Wuling Zhiguang car. Yu Bin remitted money to the other party through the Agricultural Bank of China. About ten minutes after Bin sent out the payment of 3,000 yuan, the payment was taken away from Changshu Agricultural Bank. The other party did not deliver the goods, and Yu Bin felt cheated. On March 25, 2011, Yu Bin reported to our bureau, and our bureau promptly informed him that the case was not under our jurisdiction and he should report the case to the Jiangsu police. Yu Bin reported the case to the Jiangsu police, but the Jiangsu police refused to accept it on the grounds that there was no such company, so Yu Bin sent a letter to the Ministry of Public Security on July 7.

Recently, our bureau has contacted Yu Bin for interviews many times, but Yu Bin was unable to meet with the police of our bureau because he was busy with business. Before and after the Spring Festival, our bureau contacted Yu Bin several times but failed to see him. Yu Bin said that he would take the initiative to meet at the Public Security Bureau when he had time.

3. Handling of Zhang Qinghai’s letters and visits

   (1) Basic information of petitioners

Zhang Qinghai, male, 76 years old, lived at No. 118 Xiaoluzhuang Natural Village, Sanjiaoyuan Village Committee, Jiuxian Town, Taihe County. Before 1986, Zhang Qinghai served as the head of the five-star water management station until his retirement.

   (2) Main demands of petitioners

Zhang Qinghai submitted a letter reporting that brothers Wang Jiabin, Wang Yawei, and Wang Weitao, residents of Shuangfu Town, occupied the land of the Wuxing Water Pipe Station and destroyed property, requesting the public security organs to deal with it according to law.

   (3) Matters involved in visits and verification handling

According to the investigation, in the first half of 2006, the three-story building built by Shuangfu residents Wang Yawei, Wang Weitao, Wang Jiabin and others was adjacent to the Wuxing water pipe station. Zhang Qinghai learned about the building after the incident. Subsequent appeals to relevant departments.

The land on which the five-star water management station and Wang Jiabin and others built their houses belonged to the tractor station in the double-floor area. After the district was withdrawn to build a township, the land occupied by the tractor station in Shuangfu District was divided into two parts, the east side belonged to Xiaozhangzhuang, Shuangfu Town, and the west side (that is, Wuxing Water Management Station) belonged to Wuxingwang Xiaozhuang. Later, Wang Jiabin’s father, Wang Yonghua, purchased the eastern half of the land from Zhang Zhengshan, Zhang Zhengkui, and Zhang Zhengdong, residents of Xiaozhangzhuang, Shuangfu Town (attachment: land transfer agreement).

When Wang Jiabin and others built their houses, they dug the foundation and compacted the ground, causing a house to the east of the Wuxing Water Pipe Station to collapse. After investigation, no forcible house-stealing was found.

Regarding the dispute over property rights, Taihe County Water Conservancy Bureau filed a lawsuit with the People’s Court. On July 1, 1998, the Taihe County People’s Court rejected the suit filed by Taihe County Water Conservancy Bureau. The court held that: neither party had a legal certificate of ownership of the disputed land, and the ownership was unclear. It should be resolved by the administrative agency (land management department) according to law, and it was not within the scope of the people’s court to accept the case (attached: the court’s civil ruling).

Zhang Qinghai once called the police to the Five Star Police Station of our Bureau, but the police from the Five Star Police Station failed to mediate on the spot. Later, Zhang Qinghai reported to our Bureau many times. After investigation, our Bureau determined that Zhang Qinghai’s claim that the Five Star Water Pipe Station and ground attachments were damaged by Wang Yawei and others was wrong. It constitutes a violation of the law and belongs to a general land dispute, and our bureau has notified the parties in accordance with the law.

Our office is determined to press for a settlement between the two parties. Zhang Qinghai’s son, Zhang Bin, works at the Jiuxian Police Station of our bureau, and our bureau uses Zhang Bin to do his father’s ideological work. Wang Yawei and others coordinated through the town government and Shuangfu celebrities. Zhang Qinghai agreed to stop the visit conditionally.

4. Handling of Zhang Shuqin’s letters and visits

    (1) Basic information of petitioners

     Petitioner Zhang Shuqin, female, 52 years old, a farmer, originally from Taihe County, Anhui Province, moved her family’s household registration to Heilongjiang in 2002, and now lives in Huma Town, Huma County, Heilongjiang Province.

(2) Letters and visits

  Petitioner Zhang Shuqin sent a letter to the Ministry of Public Security on July 7, 2011, requesting that Zhang Jie, Zhang Feng, Jin Cuirong, Sun Lianfang and others be held accountable for their crimes and the responsibility of the relevant case-handling department personnel.

    (3) Handling of Letters and Visits

     After investigation, on December 24, 1998, Zhang Jie, a native of Zhangdazhuang, Shuizhen Town, Taihe County, beat Zhang Lei, a fellow villager, to death and fled. On December 25, 2006, our bureau arrested Zhang Jie, who was later sentenced to life imprisonment.

     Our bureau investigated the relevant personnel of the case and filed a case against Zhang Feng on December 24, 1998. On December 28, 1998, our bureau approved the criminal detention of Zhang Feng. On October 16, 2000, Zhang Feng came to our bureau He surrendered himself, and was released on bail pending trial by our bureau on the 18th of the same month, and was released on October 16, 2001. At the same time, on January 24 and March 24, 2007, Zhang Jie’s mother, Sun Lianfang, and wife, Jin Cuirong, who were suspected of covering up crimes, were investigated for investigation. On April 17, 2007, Sun Lianfang, Jin Cuirong, and Zhang Feng were submitted to the procuratorate for arrest. On April 26 of the same year, Sun Lianfang and Zhang Feng were arrested by the Taihe County Procuratorate on suspicion of harboring, but Jin Cuirong was not arrested. On April 29, 2007, Sun Lianfang was released on bail pending trial due to a serious illness. On May 14, Zhang Feng was released on bail pending trial because he would not cause social danger. On May 24, 2007, our bureau sued Sun Lianfang and Zhang Feng. After the case was prosecuted, after two withdrawals, the Taihe County People’s Procuratorate sent a letter to our bureau on October 24, 2007: “The fact that the criminal suspect Zhang Feng was found guilty of the crime of harboring is unclear and the evidence is insufficient. The committee conducted research on October 24, 2007, and decided to return the case of Zhang Feng to your bureau for further investigation and to deal with it according to law.” On November 29, 2007, the Taihe County People’s Procuratorate sent a letter to our bureau: “The criminal suspect Sun Lianfang was identified in the file as a criminal The fact that the subjective intention and objective behavior of the crime of harboring is unclear and the evidence is insufficient, after the review committee of this court studied on November 28, 2007, it was decided to return the case of Sun Lianfang to your bureau for handling.” After our bureau’s executive meeting in 2007 On December 5, 2009, it was determined that Sun Lianfang and Zhang Feng would continue to be released on bail pending further investigation. On April 24, 2008, Sun Lianfang and Zhang Feng were released from bail pending trial by our bureau because the bail pending trial period was about to expire. Zhang Shuqin requested that Zhang Jie be sentenced to death, and that Zhang Feng, Jin Cuirong, Sun Lianfang and others be held criminally responsible for their alleged cover-up. Dissatisfied with the court’s judgment and the procuratorate’s finding that Zhang Feng and the other three did not constitute a crime, he appealed in many places.

     Because Zhang Shuqin’s household registration was moved to Huma Town, Huma County, Heilongjiang Province in 2002, and she is often active in the Beijing area, she cannot be contacted or returned for a follow-up visit.

5. Letters and visits from Zhao Xiuling

(1) Basic information of petitioners

Zhao Xiuling, female, 53 years old, lives in Liuxinyu Village, Caimiao Town, Taihe County, and works as a farmer.

  (2) Letters and visits

In March 1997, three members of his family were poisoned, resulting in the death of his daughter and the sequelae of his son and husband. The public security organs were required to investigate and deal with it according to the law, and the government gave them proper care.

  (3) Handling of cases

    1. Basic information of the case

On the morning of March 13, 1997 (the fifth day of the second month of the lunar calendar), Zhao Xiuling’s husband Liu Congde, son Liu Insurance, and daughter Liu Yanfeng ate dumplings stuffed with leeks at home. At around 1:40 in the afternoon, Liu Insurance and Liu Yanfeng went to school for class at 3 o’clock The two felt dizzy, but not very severe. After returning home from class at 4 o’clock, Liu Yanfeng felt a headache and fever. She went to see a doctor in the village Liu Shanying and prescribed antipyretics. At six or seven o’clock in the evening, Liu Insurance was cooking and Liu Yanfeng was cooking Steamed buns, stir-fried radish dishes, the two of them did their homework until after nine o’clock after dinner, and fell asleep at ten o’clock. At night, Liu Baobao suffered from diarrhea, and when he got up the next morning, he went to see a doctor at Liu Shanying’s in the village. what disease. After returning home, Liu Yanfeng’s hands and feet began to twitch and she couldn’t move. The three of them went to the traditional Chinese medicine hospital for treatment. After arriving at the traditional Chinese medicine hospital, all three of them showed symptoms of poisoning. Ten days later (March 24, 1997) Liu Yanfeng died due to rescue efforts. Later, Zhao Xiuling reported the case to Caimiao Criminal Police Squadron, and the squadron started work in time.

2. Case handling

On March 31, 1997, the forensic doctor of the Technical Squadron of the Criminal Police Brigade of our Bureau sent a total of 6 copies of Zhao Xiuling’s kitchen water, leftovers, coarse salt, and rat poison in the main room to Fuyang Sanitation and Epidemic Prevention Station for poison analysis. The result is: the water in the bucket is negative, and the rest of the samples are positive.

After the incident, the Criminal Police Brigade set up a special case team and promptly stationed in Caimiao to carry out work. The police from the special case team visited Zhao Xiuling’s family and the place where the case occurred, and questioned the victims Zhao Xiuling, Liu Insurance, and Liu Congde. According to the information provided by Zhao Xiuling and Liu Congde, they suspected that their village Liu Qing is suspected of committing a major crime. After investigation: two days before the incident (the third day of the first month of the lunar calendar in 1997), Liu Congde and Liu Qing went to Zhanglou’s mother’s house in Zhaomiao Town to pay New Year’s greetings. On the way, Liu Congde went to the house of his cousin in Jiangzhuang, Zhaomiao Town. When Liu Qing arrived home, he told Zhao Xiuling that Liu Congde had drunk too much and could not come back. Having sex, Zhao Xiuling did not agree. The next day, because Liu Qing introduced a boyfriend to “Mei” in the village, he got into a fight with Liu Congde’s son Liu Baoan and was persuaded by his neighbors to let him go. Liu Qing threatened to kill Liu Congde’s family. After questioning Liu Qing and his activities, there is no evidence to prove that he committed the crime. Later, Liu Qing left and has not returned yet.

On February 25, 2008, Zhao Xiuling went to Caimiao Squadron to report that Liu Qing was at Zhang Xikong’s house in Ma’anshan. After investigation, Zhang Xikong is the chairman of the labor union of Maanshan Iron and Steel Company, and his two daughters both work in Maanshan Iron and Steel Company. Liu Qing’s eldest sister Liu Cuifang, second sister Liu Cuirong, third sister Liu Cuiying, and Liu Qing have not contacted their families for more than ten years after they left However, after checking the phone numbers of Liu Cuifang and Liu Cuirong, no suspicion was found.

   (4) Recent work situation

The special case team of the criminal police brigade of our bureau took the following measures: 1. Issue a letter of persuasion to the relatives of the suspect Liu Qing to inform the interests; Grasp the information; 4. Arrange and control the places where they go out to work; 5. Implement one guarantee and three guarantees, and consider their actual living difficulties to solve the subsistence allowance for them. 6. Regular return visits to Zhao Xiuling to strengthen guidance and explanation.

In recent years, our bureau has actively reported to the party committee and the government, and handled minimum living allowances for Zhao Xiuling’s family in accordance with regulations. The police of our bureau often provide assistance to Zhao Xiuling’s family’s agricultural production. On August 10, 2011, the police from our bureau visited Zhao Xiuling. Zhao Xiuling expressed her understanding of the difficulty of the work of the public security organs. In December 2011, Liu Xinsheng, deputy secretary of the County Political and Legal Committee, organized relevant departments to hold a research meeting on Zhao Xiuling’s letters and visits. The meeting decided that the leaders of Caimiao Town should coordinate and coordinate with other departments to work around Zhao Xiuling’s main relatives and try to resolve it from the perspective of economic assistance.

On the morning of January 11, 2012, the expert group of the Municipal Bureau specialized in the investigation of Zhao Xiuling’s letters and visits. Deputy Director Wang Dongxi, Deputy Secretary Feng Yuguang, and Deputy Director Wang Minghua of the Municipal Bureau, as well as the legal system, letters and visits, criminal investigation and other departments of the Municipal Bureau, as well as the Office of Tackling and Evaluation, were in charge. Comrades participated, and after careful analysis and research, they concluded that: 1. The case was assigned by the Central Political Committee, and it is a key case among key cases. Second, it is almost impossible to solve the case, and economic assistance should be considered first. One-time assistance of less than 100,000 yuan can be considered, and several payments can be made in batches. Due to the possibility of rising prices, in order to avoid future entanglements, the monthly payment method is not considered. 3. Continue to do a good job of stability control before resolving.

On January 20, 2012, our bureau arranged for Sun Xianbao, director of Caimiao Police Station, to visit Zhao Xiuling and her family on behalf of the Public Security Bureau, and sent 200 yuan of condolences. At the same time, the party committee, government and village committee of Caimiao Town also sent 100 yuan each as condolences.

During the Spring Festival, the leaders of our bureau and the legal complaint department talked with Zhao Xiuling many times, and did their work through Zhao’s relatives. Recently, our Bureau plans to actively resolve this issue in conjunction with the “Three Visits and Three Comments” activities.

6. The basic situation of complaints from 72 households on Youyi Road

(1) Basic information of petitioners

Residents of 72 households on Youyi Road are residents of the family courtyard of our bureau.

(2) Letters and visits

It reflects that the development of real estate by Baitaihaojing developers affects the lighting of residential areas and encroaches on public land in residential areas, and hurts innocent people in disputes.

(3) Matters handled

The family courtyard of our bureau is adjacent to Baitaihaojing Community in the east. Due to the renovation of the adjacent courtyard wall, residents of our bureau’s family courtyard had a dispute with the developer of Taihaojing. This matter involved the policemen and their families of our bureau. The county leaders arranged for Taihe The County Political and Legal Committee took the lead in the investigation, and after the coordination of the Political and Legal Committee, the two parties have initially reached a settlement intention on the disputed matters.

简体中文