朱令案责任人张良基，高煜，朱令案的办案单位北京市公安局十四处和文保总队

朱令案责任人张良基，高煜，朱令案的办案单位北京市公安局十四处和文保总队

第二个话题
是说一下说朱令案责任人张良基，高煜，朱令案的办案单位北京市公安局十四处和文保总队。

清华大学是一个很强的组织的

先说大学
马云马化腾费拉，科技公司被习近平干烂了
江泽民胡锦涛费拉，元老被习近平干烂了
许家印王健林费拉，地产被习近平干烂了
俞敏洪费拉，教培被习近平干烂了

只有怀进鹏一个人，把习近平干烂了
单挑习近平，四所大学拒绝迁往雄安

方惠坚 党委书记 1988年9月 – 1995年9月
王大中 校长 1994年1月 – 2003年4月
贺美英 党委书记 1995年9月 – 2002年2月
顾秉林 校长 2003年4月 – 2012年2月

这个话题是这样的
疫情期间左翼政府出台了很多独裁措施
打击自由民主
澳大利亚的，欧洲的，美国的，加拿大的
但是
人民能够反抗
把左翼政府出台的这些独裁措施给反击回去
虽然不见得能够完全反击回去
但是和中国比那是差着还几百个水平的
就是民主国家的社会还是正常的社会

前面我说的中国在习近平的进攻下
整个社会在溃败
无论是科技公司，还是政治局常委的元老
还是地产大亨，还是教培等等
都毫无反抗能力
整个社会在溃败
只有大学迁往雄安这个事情
大学的抵抗能力比较强
当然迁往雄安可能确实是动了大学相关利益群体的
切身利益
所以遭到了系统性的反抗
在这件事情上，习近平等于在挑战这个中共的制度体系

我说这个的目的是
说
清华大学是一个很强的组织的
北京市公安局是一个正局级单位
只不过局长高配成副部级
这个是从周永康开始搞的
张良基那时候，他只是一个局长
不是副部级
清华大学的党委书记和校长现在也是副部级
也就是说，清华大学其实和北京市公安局是平级单位

其次我说一下
北京市公安局十四处是一个什么单位
后来叫文保处，文保总队
文保的意思顾名思义
就是文化单位保卫
除了管大学
还管医院。

文保总队呢当时有18个重点人

秦晖，崔卫平，郝建，王绥瑚，郭于华，贺卫方，唐晓渡，胡星斗，李爽，萧瀚(叶菁)，王绥琛，夏业良，许志永，杨支柱，宋国锋，滕彪，徐友渔，唐磬

当时他们就政治迫害许志永

卫报：中国人权活动人士李翘楚因”煽动颠覆国家政权罪”受审

据英国《卫报》12月19日报道，在中国被关押近三年的人权活动人士李翘楚在山东省受审，罪名是”煽动颠覆国家政权”。

在审判前夕，美国国会的中国问题委员会主席呼吁无条件释放李翘楚，理由是有报道称这位劳工权利和女权活动家需要紧急治疗。

卫报说，李翘楚的罪名最多可判处五年徒刑，如果她被视为领头人，刑期可能更长。

李翘楚的律师李国蓓（北京必奕律师事务所主任）说，她在进入临沂市中级人民法院时被两名保安阻拦，而对李翘楚审判应该是在该法院进行。

李翘楚的另一名律师获准进入法庭。

据脸书主页”FreeLiqiaochu”报道，李翘楚的审判于当地时间下午3点结束，没有公开宣判。

李翘楚是被监禁的人权律师许志永的合伙人，许志永是中国民权运动领袖之一。 11月，山东一家法院维持了对许志永和人权律师丁家喜颠覆国家政权罪的判决，分别判处他们14年和12年监禁。

根据支持者的描述，当李翘楚今年四月能够会见她的律师时，她说自己对许志永的感情”从未改变过”，她的支持者还说，李翘楚的家人曾多次要求会见她，但都被拒绝了。

李翘楚于2021年3 月14 日被捕，在此之前她曾被“指定居所监视居住”几个月，这是中国警方使用的一种拘留形式，将某人关押在普通监狱之外，且无法与家人或律师见面。从那段拘留期获释后，李翘楚描述她经历了”黑头罩和手铐、封闭的房间、24小时的白光灯照射”。

据英国卫报介绍，李翘楚女士曾就职于清华大学社会学系，她至少从2017年起开始担任研究员并成为社会活动人士，当时她与其他志愿者一起为2017年在北京被赶出家门的农民工提供支持。之后，她支持多起MeToo运动，同时帮助许志永维护”美丽中国”网站，在该网站上发表有关中国公民权利运动的文章。

本周一，李翘楚的支持者说，非常担心她的身体健康。她曾说，她在拘留期间被剥夺了服用抗抑郁药的权利。2020年，她在信中写道，她正在偷偷断药，以防将来被捕。

国际特赦组织中国团队负责人莎拉·布鲁克斯(Sarah Brooks) 表示：“对李翘楚的审判突显了任何试图在中国倡导人权的人都面临着严重的镇压环境，即使他们从事的活动完全是和平的，并处于国际法保护的范围内。”

关于北外乔木自荐参选的情况续报（九）111106005 文保

2011-11-06 19:41:56

针对北京外国语大学副教授乔木准备以自荐参选人身份参加海淀区人大换届选举的情况，学校副校长、党校办主任和英语学院党支部书记、院长等人分别找到乔木和其“助选团”成员进行谈话。
昨天晚上，北外英语学院党支部书记王卫放、院长孙有中找到乔木“助选团”15名学生成员进行了集体座谈和个别谈话。在谈话过程中，多数同学表示帮助乔木参选只是想了解一下人大代表选举工作的制度，但近期感觉乔木思想有些过激、固执，再加上自己的事情较多，便很少参与助选活动。但个别同学在谈话中也流露出抵触的思想情绪。
今天上午，北外副校长文君和党校办主任贾德忠找到乔木进行谈话。学校领导首先表示支持其在法律允许范围内行使自己的公民权利，但要求乔木遵守学校校规，不要再散发书签等宣传材料。对此，乔木保证将会在法律规定范围内开展竞选活动，并表示“助选”书签将于明日到货，其将与“助选团”商议后决定是否上交学校。在谈话期间，乔木态度较好，但仍存在抵触心理。
我总队将继续配合学校党委做好谈话工作，并制定投票当天的控制工作方案。
郝世毅副总队长示：报勤务指挥部，国保总队，情报信息中心。通报五大队。

文保重点人许志勇在北京邮电大学学生食堂演讲（勤指111104034）

2011-11-04 20:28:54

4日19时42分，海淀分局吕宏波报：刚刚我分局北太平庄派出所工作了解，文保重点人许志勇现在在北京邮电大学新学生食堂进行演讲，拉票选人大代表。现场人员流动性较大，聚集人员约有20人。
即告海淀分局吕洪波报：我分局已通报文保总队，并报告主管国保支队副局长王春宇，派出所民警已着便装现场观察。
20时07分，报张局阅示。搜集汇总国保、文保、技侦、海淀相关信息，汇总此事件完整情况。通报研判处梳理相关情报线索并上综报，通报查控处入重点人库。配合文保、海淀开展信息支持工作。

续报

2011-11-04 20:30:29
2011年11月4日18时许，许志永协其学生二三人来到北京邮电大学新学生食堂外的拐角处，并立上一张1.0×0.8米的纸质牌子，上写有个人参加过活动的自我介绍。后许志永在此地进行了演讲，主要内容是为其参选人大代表进行拉票，“人不光要吃饱饭，还要公平和正义”、“希望学生支持我，大家投我一票”等。过程中，现场随着人员流动，大概有20人左右，无喊口号、散发传单等行为。
19时30分学校保卫处以维护校园秩序为由，将聚集人员劝散，现人已离开。

北京邮电大学和北京外国语大学发现许志永与乔木的竞选宣传品（文保111104031）

2011-11-04 21:18:09
今日，我总队工作发现，有4名文法经济学院的学生在北京邮电大学校内图书馆附近，张贴印有许志永参加人大代表选举的海报5张。海报长约90公分，宽约70公分，黑底绿字，上印有许志永的巨幅照片，以及许近年来参与的打工子弟学校拆迁、废除收容遣送制度、组织围观黑监狱等社会活动简介。海报标题为“11月8日投票日，请‘另选他人’”，副标题为“选择许老师，选择理想和正义”，海报下方还印有许的手机、博客、电子邮箱等联系方式。发现此况后，我总队紧密依靠北京邮电大学党委及保卫部门，及时将从事张贴活动的4名学生予以带离，开展谈话教育，同时将海报予以收缴。
同日，工作发现，乔木与10名学生分别在北京外国语大学东区食堂和宿舍楼，西区教工餐厅和外研社散发题为“11月8日，另选乔木，你身边的代表”的竞选宣传单。传单为A4纸大小，白纸黑字，正反两面都印有内容。正面内容是乔木的竞选宣言，以及支持者在网上给乔木的留言，下方印有《选择法》中“另选他人”的法律条文。反面印有乔木在“人人网”和“博客”上张贴的《作为北外的一位选民，我有话要说》、《我为啥投乔木一票》、《乔木参选建议》等文章，下方印有选票样式，及如何以“另选他人”方式填写选票的方法。正反两页底部都印有乔木的博客地址、手机电话等联系方式。由于当时正值中午人流较大，估计散发数量有60余份。针对此况，我总队紧密依靠北京外国语大学党委，及时派遣力量将参与从事散发活动的乔木和学生予以劝离，进行谈话教育，同时将未散发的传单予以收缴。
我总队将密切关注此事相关动向，发现情况将及时上报。
19时14分，郝世毅副总队长示：报一局、市局情报信息中心、通报国保总队，通报市委教工委。

关于阻止乔木在海淀区北科大厦举办选民与媒体见面会的工作情况（文保111104032）

2011-11-04 21:19:52
11月3日，乔木在其新浪微博发布，计划于11月6日下午14时30分至16时，在西三环北路27号北科大厦三层报告厅举行“北外乔木与选民见面暨媒体沟通会”。针对此况，我总队领导高度重视，立即遵照市局领导“坚决阻止”的指示精神，组织力量前往北科大厦开展工作。
经向北科大厦办公室、安保部、物业公司等部门了解，3日13时左右，一名男子通过该大厦物业公司办公电话（68732042）联系，要在6日14时30分至16时租用该大厦三层报告厅（可容纳100人左右）搞活动，未透露活动具体内容。对此，物业公司经理答复，租借报告厅需要就活动内容、活动时间、以及参与人员等情况具体面谈，要求对方4日到大厦物业进行沟通，但截止目前该人未前来做具体接洽。
为坚决阻止乔木在北科大厦举办“选民与媒体见面会”，我总队要求北科大厦于5日和6日做好以下工作，确保万无一失。一是如该人再来联系租用场地，则以单位内部有活动为由予以拒绝，坚决不能将内部场所出租，从事任何涉及敏感问题活动使用；二是该报告厅有两把钥匙，分别由安保部和物业公司保管，5日、6日两天钥匙必须由上述两部门负责人保管，严格控制使用；三是5日、6日两天要加强门卫管理，以休息日为由，禁止社会人员进入。此外，我总队将对此事予以跟进了解，5日、6日两天将安排警力到场掌握情况、配合北科大夏相关部门共同做好工作。
19时17分，郝世毅副总队长示：报市局情报信息中心、通报国保总队、海淀分局。通报教工委。

然后我说一下

朱令案责任人张良基和高煜

张良基退休后找了一个小媳妇，比他女儿年龄还小
他女儿都不愿意和他来往了

北京市公安局十四处后来的文保总队
他的破案水平在北京市公安局里是什么水平呢？
因为投毒案和爆炸案的破案难度
本来就很大
北京市公安局里面
破案水平最高的
自然是刑侦总队
然后是朝海丰，朝阳海淀丰台的刑侦支队
东城西城
然后是近郊，远郊区的刑侦支队
其实有个城区的大派出所的破案水平
比远郊区的延庆平谷什么的
还高
他们给派出所定的指标
每个月刑事拘留多少人
治安拘留或者说行政拘留多少人
定这个指标也未必合理
有的郊区的派出所
每个月的刑拘指标就是一个人
刑事拘留
这就是很扯淡的事情
每个月一个人，一年12个人
基本就是冤假错案，凑数
要么就是从刑侦支队借指标，就是变相买指标
给刑侦支队点好处，然后说是共同办案
为了凑这个指标
有的时候实在没招了就屈打成招
把本来是治安拘留的，硬给搞成刑事拘留
就是说
不管刑警队，还是派出所
如果每月刑拘，刑事拘留的人数少于10人
在我看来就很不专业
比如说城区的刑侦支队或者派出所
每个月的指标就是几十个人，甚至一两百人
你不能都是冤假错案吧
你去琢磨屈打成招，效率也低啊
就是他们天天抓人还有一定的专业性
抓的真的是贼
像文保总队这种单位
平常根本就不办案子
他们哪儿会办案子啊？
打个比方如果说刑侦总队的破案能力是100分的话
海淀分局刑侦支队可能有个七八十分
那么文保总队破案能力就是1分或者0分
他们不会办案子
更不用说投毒案，这种疑难案件了

什么意思呢
也就是说
张良基当初把朱令案放在十四处，后来叫文保总队
那就是不想破案
如果真想破案，应该让刑侦总队，或者清华大学所在
的海淀分局刑侦支队来办理这个案件

就是说
一开始的动机就不对

方惠坚 党委书记 1988年9月 – 1995年9月
王大中 校长 1994年1月 – 2003年4月
贺美英 党委书记 1995年9月 – 2002年2月
顾秉林 校长 2003年4月 – 2012年2月

其次呢
保护伞是谁呢
就是孙孚凌
孙孚凌 １９８３年至１９９３年任北京市副市长
1994年刚刚退下来
热乎劲儿还在

北京市公安局局长历任的是
张良基 副总警监（1995年1月20日－1999年3月）
强卫 副总警监（1999年3月－2001年8月）
马振川 副总警监（2001年9月－2010年2月）
傅政华 副总警监（2010年2月26日－2015年3月26日，公安部副部长兼，正部长级）
王小洪 副总警监（2015年3月26日－2020年4月24日，公安部副部长兼，正部长级）
亓延军 副总警监（2020年4月24日－，公安部副部长兼，正部长级）
我们看现在北京市公安局局长亓延军
他是北京市副市长
北京市有几个副市长
也就8个吧
反正没几个
就是现在的北京市副市长都是同事吧

中共的水军扯什么宿舍其他人可能涉案
甚至扯到贝志诚头上了

这都是纯粹在搅混水

洗地都不会
这个案子自始至终
中共的宣传话语里面
没有一个词就是“疑罪从无”
就是证据不足，疑罪从无

为什么呢？
因为在案子当时的背景下
就没有疑罪从无这么一说

网上不是有一种说法吗

很多你现在觉得习以为常的东西，可能是不久之前才出现的。

一、1992年以后，才取消了粮票。
二、1995年才实行双休日，之前是大小周，再往前是单休。
三、2002年以后，商品供应才逐渐丰富，很多东西有钱就能买到。
四、2003年普通人才慢慢用上手机，人手一机。
五、2006年才取消农业税。
六、2008年淘宝才开始火起来，人们真正开始享受网上购物带来的便利。
七、2009年开始智能手机才慢慢普及。
八、2011年微信才出现，人们真正开始实现便利沟通。
所以，好日子才开始并没有多少年。

中国其实连文明的地板都没有摸到呢

1994年是疑罪从有，或者说的好听点
是疑罪从轻，
那时候的警察天天喝大酒，下午都处在撒酒疯的状态
周永康实行了五条禁令之后
警察中午才不喝酒的

现在中共水军洗地呢
扯什么除了孙维之外还有宿舍其他人可能嫌疑人
甚至是贝志诚
但是
不管是谁
总有一个嫌疑人吧，但是谁也没抓
在1994年，中国警察在怎么破案呢
如果孙维没有背景的话
就是抓起来打一顿，
取得口供来破案
这是当时警察办案的标准流程

2013年5月8日，北京市公安局通过其官方微博“平安北京”发表一篇长微博，向社会通报该案有关情况。其中还特别指出“工作中，专案组始终坚持依法公正办案，未受到任何干扰。”
这就是个笑话
当时主管内保，文保的北京市公安局副局长是高煜
高煜还管过一段时间的经侦
高煜以前就是十四处的副处长，处长
等于2013年北京市公安局的长微博是高煜自己在替自己澄清
高煜本来就是十四处的副处长，处长
2013年跳出来说，自己公正办案
从程序上说，就是利益冲突
这种话毫无公信力可言

英文翻译

Zhang Liangji and Gao Yu, the persons responsible for the Zhu Ling case, the 14th Division of the Beijing Public Security Bureau and the Cultural Protection Corps, the handling units of the Zhu Ling case

second topic
Let’s talk about Zhang Liangji and Gao Yu, the persons responsible for the Zhu Ling case, as well as the 14th Division of the Beijing Public Security Bureau and the Cultural Protection Corps, which handled the Zhu Ling case.

Tsinghua University is a very strong organization
Let’s talk about university first
Jack Ma, Pony Ma, and technology companies were ruined by Xi Jinping
Jiang Zemin, Hu Jintao Fela, the elders were fucked to death by Xi Jinping
Xu Jiayin, Wang Jianlin, Fela, real estate was ruined by Xi Jinping
Yu Minhongfela, education and training was ruined by Xi Jinping

Only Huai Jinpeng killed Xi Jinping.
To challenge Xi Jinping, four universities refused to move to Xiongan

Fang Huijian Party Committee Secretary September 1988 – September 1995
Wang Dazhong Principal January 1994 – April 2003
He Meiying Party Secretary September 1995 – February 2002
Gu Binglin Principal April 2003 – February 2012

This topic is like this
During the epidemic, the left-wing government introduced many authoritarian measures
Attack liberal democracy
Australian, European, American, Canadian
but
People can resist
Fight back these authoritarian measures introduced by the left-wing government
Although it may not be possible to completely fight back
But compared with China, it is still hundreds of levels behind.
Is it a democratic society or a normal society?

As I mentioned earlier, China is under Xi Jinping’s attack
The whole society is collapsing
Whether it is a technology company or a veteran of the Politburo Standing Committee,
Or a real estate tycoon, or education and training, etc.
All have no ability to resist
The whole society is collapsing
The only thing that matters is the university’s relocation to Xiongan
Universities have relatively strong resistance
Of course, the move to Xiongan may indeed have disturbed university-related interest groups.
vital interests
Therefore, there was systematic resistance
In this matter, Xi Jinping is challenging the CCP’s institutional system

The reason I say this is
explain
Tsinghua University is a very strong organization
The Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau is a bureau-level unit
It’s just that the director Gao was appointed to the deputy ministerial level
This started from Zhou Yongkang
At that time, Zhang Liangji was just a director
Not deputy ministerial level
The party secretary and president of Tsinghua University are now also deputy ministers
In other words, Tsinghua University is actually on the same level as the Beijing Public Security Bureau.

Next, let me talk about
What kind of unit is the 14th Division of the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau?
Later it was called the Cultural Preservation Office and the Cultural Preservation Corps
Wenbao means as the name suggests.
It’s the protection of cultural units
In addition to running the university
Also in charge of the hospital.

There were 18 key people in the Cultural Protection Corps at that time.
Qin Hui, Cui Weiping, Hao Jian, Wang Suihu, Guo Yuhua, He Weifang, Tang Xiaodu, Hu Xingdou, Li Shuang, Xiao Han (Ye Jing), Wang Suichen, Xia Yeliang, Xu Zhiyong, Yang Zhuzhu, Song Guofeng, Teng Biao, Xu Youyu, Tang Qing

At that time, they politically persecuted Xu Zhiyong

The Guardian: Chinese human rights activist Li Qiaochu on trial for “inciting subversion of state power”
According to the British “Guardian” report on December 19, Li Qiaochu, a human rights activist who has been imprisoned in China for nearly three years, was tried in Shandong Province on charges of “inciting subversion of state power.”

On the eve of the trial, the chairman of the U.S. Congressional China Committee called for Li Qiaochu’s unconditional release, citing reports that the labor rights and women’s rights activist needed urgent medical treatment.

The Guardian said Li Qiaochu’s crime carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, and the sentence could be longer if she is considered a leader.

Li Qiaochu’s lawyer Li Guobei (director of Beijing Biyi Law Firm) said she was blocked by two security guards when she entered the Linyi Intermediate People’s Court, where Li Qiaochu’s trial was supposed to be held.

Another lawyer for Li Qiaochu was allowed into the court.

According to the Facebook page “FreeLiqiaochu”, Li Qiaochu’s trial ended at 3 pm local time without a public verdict.

Li Qiaochu is a partner of imprisoned human rights lawyer Xu Zhiyong, one of the leaders of China’s civil rights movement. In November, a Shandong court upheld the convictions of Xu Zhiyong and human rights lawyer Ding Jiaxi for subversion of state power, and sentenced them to 14 and 12 years in prison respectively.

When Li Qiaochu was able to meet with her lawyer in April, she said her feelings for Xu Zhiyong had “never changed,” according to supporters, who also said Li Qiaochu’s family had repeatedly requested to meet with her. , but were rejected.

Li Qiaochu was arrested on March 14, 2021, after spending several months under “residential surveillance at a designated location,” a form of detention used by Chinese police to hold someone outside a regular prison and Unable to meet with family or lawyers. After being released from that period of detention, Li Qiaochu described experiencing “black hoods and handcuffs, closed rooms, and 24-hour white light exposure.”

According to the British Guardian, Ms. Li Qiaochu once worked in the Department of Sociology at Tsinghua University. She has been working as a researcher and becoming a social activist since at least 2017, when she worked with other volunteers to defend those who were kicked out of their homes in Beijing in 2017. Migrant workers provide support. After that, she supported many MeToo movements and helped Xu Zhiyong maintain the “Beautiful China” website, where she published articles about China’s civil rights movement.

On Monday, Li Qiaochu’s supporters said they were very worried about her health. She has said she was denied the right to take antidepressants while in detention. In 2020, she wrote in a letter that she was secretly weaning off her medication to prevent future arrest.

Sarah Brooks, head of Amnesty International’s China team, said: “The trial of Li Qiaochu highlights the severely repressive environment faced by anyone trying to advocate for human rights in China, even if their activities are entirely peaceful. , and within the scope of protection under international law.”

Continuing report on the self-recommendation of Beijing Foreign Language Qiaomu for election (9) 111106005 Cultural Protection
2011-11-06 19:41:56

In response to the fact that Qiao Mu, associate professor of Beijing Foreign Studies University, was preparing to participate in the Haidian District People’s Congress general election as a self-recommended candidate, the vice president of the school, the director of the Party School Office, the party branch secretary and dean of the English School, and others approached Qiao Mu and his “election support team” respectively. members talk.
Last night, Wang Weifang, Party branch secretary of BFSU English School, and Sun Youzhong, dean, met with 15 student members of Qiaomu’s “election support group” for group discussions and individual conversations. During the conversation, most students said that they only wanted to help Qiao Mu run for election to understand the system of the National People’s Congress election work. However, they recently felt that Qiao Mu’s thoughts were a bit extreme and stubborn. In addition, because he had many things to do, he rarely participated in election support activities. However, some students also revealed conflicting thoughts and emotions in their conversations.
This morning, BFSU Vice President Wen Jun and Party School Office Director Jia Dezhong came to Qiao Mu for a talk. School leaders first expressed support for Qiao Mu in exercising his civil rights within the scope of the law, but asked Qiao Mu to abide by school rules and stop distributing bookmarks and other promotional materials. In this regard, Qiao Mu assured that he would carry out campaign activities within the scope of the law, and said that the “election support” bookmarks will arrive tomorrow, and he will decide whether to hand them over to the school after discussing with the “election support team.” During the conversation, Qiao Mu had a better attitude, but still had resistance.
Our team will continue to cooperate with the school party committee to conduct talks and formulate a control work plan for the day of voting.
Deputy Commander Hao Shiyi said: Report to the Service Command, National Security Corps, and Intelligence Information Center. Notify the fifth brigade.

Xu Zhiyong, key person in cultural protection, gave a speech in the student cafeteria of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Qinzhi 111104034)
2011-11-04 20:28:54

At 19:42 on the 4th, Haidian Branch Lu Hongbo reported: I just learned from the work of the Beitaipingzhuang Police Station of our branch that Xu Zhiyong, the key person for cultural protection, is giving a speech in the new student cafeteria of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications to canvass votes for National People’s Congress representatives. There was a large flow of people on site, with about 20 people gathered.
Immediately, Lu Hongbo of the Haidian Branch reported: Our branch has notified the Cultural Security Corps and reported Wang Chunyu, the deputy director of the National Security Detachment, and the police from the police station have been wearing civilian clothes to observe the scene.
At 20:07, the registration bureau read the instructions. Collect and summarize relevant information on national security, cultural security, technical investigation, and Haidian, and summarize the complete situation of this incident. The investigation and judgment department will sort out relevant intelligence clues and submit them to a comprehensive report, and the investigation and control office will be notified into the key personnel database. Cooperate with cultural protection and Haidian to carry out information support work.

Continue reporting
2011-11-04 20:30:29
At about 18:00 on November 4, 2011, Xu Zhiyong and two or three of his students came to the corner outside the new student cafeteria of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, and put up a 1.0×0.8 meter paper sign saying that someone had participated in the event. self-introduction. Later, Xu Zhiyong gave a speech here. The main content was to canvass votes for his candidacy as a deputy to the National People’s Congress. “People not only need to have enough to eat, but also fairness and justice,” “I hope students will support me and everyone will vote for me,” etc. During the process, there were about 20 people on site as people moved around, and there was no behavior such as shouting slogans or distributing leaflets.
At 19:30, the school security office persuaded the gathered people to disperse on the grounds of maintaining campus order, but now they have left.

Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications and Beijing Foreign Studies University discovered the campaign materials of Xu Zhiyong and Qiao Mu (Cultural Security 111104031)
2011-11-04 21:18:09
Today, our team found that four students from the School of Liberal Arts and Economics posted five posters with Xu Zhiyong’s participation in the National People’s Congress election near the library of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications. The poster is about 90 centimeters long and 70 centimeters wide, with green text on a black background. It features a large photo of Xu Zhiyong, as well as a brief introduction to the social activities Xu Zhiyong has participated in in recent years, such as the demolition of schools for migrant children, the abolition of the detention and deportation system, and organizing visits to black jails. The title of the poster is “On the voting day of November 8, please ‘choose someone else'” and the subtitle is “Choose Teacher Xu, choose ideals and justice.” Xu’s mobile phone, blog, email and other contact information are also printed at the bottom of the poster. After discovering this situation, our team closely relied on the Party Committee and the security department of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications to promptly remove the four students who were engaged in the poster activities, conduct conversation and education, and confiscate the posters.
On the same day, work revealed that Qiao Mu and 10 students were distributing campaign leaflets titled “On November 8, choose another Qiao Mu, the representative around you” in the Beijing Foreign Studies University’s East District cafeteria and dormitory building, the West District Faculty Restaurant and the Foreign Language Research Press. The flyer is A4 size, with white paper and black text, and the content is printed on both sides. The front content is Qiao Mu’s campaign manifesto, as well as supporters’ online messages to Qiao Mu, with the legal provision of “electing another person” in the “Law of Choice” printed below. The reverse side is printed with “As a voter from Beijing Foreign Studies University, I have something to say”, “Why I voted for Qiao Mu”, “Qiao Mu’s suggestions for running for election”, etc. posted on “Renren” and “Blog” Article, printed below is the ballot format and how to fill out the ballot in the “choose someone else” method. Qiao Mu’s blog address, mobile phone number and other contact information are printed at the bottom of both pages. Since there was a large crowd at noon, it is estimated that more than 60 copies were distributed. In response to this situation, our team closely relied on the Party Committee of Beijing Foreign Studies University and promptly dispatched forces to persuade Qiao Mu and students who participated in the distribution activities to leave, conduct talks and education, and at the same time collect undistributed leaflets.
Our team will pay close attention to the relevant trends in this matter and will report the situation in a timely manner.
At 19:14, Deputy Captain Hao Shiyi said: Report to the First Bureau, the Municipal Bureau Intelligence and Information Center, the National Security Corps, and the Municipal Party Committee Education and Work Committee.

Regarding the work to prevent Qiao Mu from holding a meeting between voters and the media at the Beike Building in Haidian District (Cultural Protection 111104032)
2011-11-04 21:19:52
On November 3, Qiaomu announced on its Sina Weibo that it planned to hold “Beiwai Qiaomu and Voters” on November 6 from 14:30 to 16:00 in the lecture hall on the third floor of Beike Building, No. 27 West Third Ring North Road. Meeting and media communication meeting.” In response to this situation, the leaders of our corps attached great importance to it and immediately followed the spirit of the instructions of the municipal bureau leaders to “resolutely stop it” and organized forces to go to the Beike Building to carry out work.
According to information from the office, security department, property management company and other departments of Xiangbeike Building, around 13:00 on the 3rd, a man contacted the building’s property management company’s office phone number (68732042) and wanted to rent the property from 14:30 to 16:00 on the 6th. The lecture hall on the third floor of the building (which can accommodate about 100 people) held activities, but the specific content of the activities was not disclosed. In response, the manager of the property company replied that the leasing report hall needs to conduct detailed interviews on the content of the activities, activity time, and participants, etc., and requires the other party to communicate with the building property on the 4th, but so far the person has not come to make specific contacts.
In order to resolutely prevent Qiao Mu from holding a “voters and media meeting” in the Beike Building, our Corps requires the Beike Building to do the following work on the 5th and 6th to ensure nothing goes wrong. First, if the person comes to rent the venue again, he will be refused on the grounds that there are activities within the unit. The internal venue must not be rented out for any activities involving sensitive issues; second, there are two keys to the lecture hall, one of which is owned by the security department. The keys must be kept by the property management company on the 5th and 6th. The keys must be kept by the persons in charge of the above two departments on the 5th and 6th, and their use must be strictly controlled; thirdly, the doorman management must be strengthened on the 5th and 6th, and no members of the public are allowed to enter on the grounds of rest days. . In addition, our corps will follow up on the matter and will arrange police personnel to be on the scene on the 5th and 6th to understand the situation and cooperate with relevant departments in Beidaxia to do a good job.
At 19:17, Deputy Captain Hao Shiyi said: Report to the Municipal Bureau Intelligence and Information Center, the National Security Corps, and the Haidian Branch. Notify the Education Committee.

Then I’ll say it
Zhang Liangji and Gao Yu, the persons responsible for the Zhu Ling case

After Zhang Liangji retired, he found a daughter-in-law who was younger than his daughter.
His daughter doesn’t want to associate with him anymore

The 14th Division of the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau later became the Cultural Protection Corps
What is his level of crime-solving skills compared to the Beijing Public Security Bureau?
Because of the difficulty of solving poisoning cases and bombing cases
It was already big
Inside the Beijing Public Security Bureau
The highest level of crime solving
Naturally, it’s the Criminal Investigation Corps
Then there is Chaohaifeng, the criminal investigation detachment of Chaoyang Haidian Fengtai
east city west city
Then there are the criminal investigation detachments in the suburbs and outer suburbs
In fact, there is a large police station in the urban area that can solve crimes
Compared to Yanqing Pinggu in the outer suburbs or something like that
Still high
The indicators they set for the police station
How many people are detained in criminal detention every month?
How many people are detained in public security or administrative detention?
It may not be reasonable to set this indicator.
Some suburban police stations
The monthly punishment quota is one person
Criminal detention
This is nonsense
One person per month, 12 people per year
It’s basically an unjust, false or wrongful conviction, just to make up the numbers.
Either borrowing indicators from the criminal investigation detachment, or buying indicators in disguise
Give the criminal investigation detachment some benefits, and then say we can jointly handle the case.
In order to collect this indicator
Sometimes when I really have no more moves, I just give in and make a move.
What was originally a security detention was turned into a criminal detention
that is
Regardless of the criminal police team or the police station
If criminal detention is carried out every month, the number of people under criminal detention is less than 10
It seems very unprofessional to me.
For example, the criminal investigation detachment or police station in an urban area
The monthly target is dozens of people, or even one or two hundred people
You can’t have all the cases being unjust, false or wrong, right?
It’s inefficient for you to think about subduing and making a move.
It’s just that they arrest people every day and have a certain level of professionalism.
He really caught a thief
Units like the Cultural Protection Corps
Normally I don’t handle cases at all
Where can they handle the case?
For example, if the criminal investigation team’s crime-solving ability is 100 points
The criminal investigation detachment of Haidian Branch may have 70 or 80
Then the cultural protection team’s crime-solving ability is 1 or 0 points
They won’t handle the case
Not to mention the poisoning case, such a difficult case

What does that mean
That is to say
Zhang Liangji initially placed Zhu Ling’s case in Division 14, which was later called the Cultural Protection Corps.
That’s because I don’t want to solve the case
If you really want to solve the case, you should let the Criminal Investigation Corps or the Tsinghua University
The Criminal Investigation Detachment of Haidian Branch came to handle this case.

that is
The motivation was wrong from the beginning

Fang Huijian Party Committee Secretary September 1988 – September 1995
Wang Dazhong Principal January 1994 – April 2003
He Meiying Party Secretary September 1995 – February 2002
Gu Binglin Principal April 2003 – February 2012

Secondly
Who is the umbrella?
That’s Sun Fuling
Sun Fuling served as deputy mayor of Beijing from 1983 to 1993
Just retired in 1994
The heat is still there

The successive directors of the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau are:
Zhang Liangji, Deputy Chief Superintendent (January 20, 1995 – March 1999)
Qiang Wei, Deputy Chief Superintendent (March 1999-August 2001)
Ma Zhenchuan, Deputy Chief Superintendent (September 2001-February 2010)
Fu Zhenghua, Deputy Chief Superintendent (February 26, 2010 – March 26, 2015, Deputy Minister and Minister of the Ministry of Public Security, Minister-level)
Wang Xiaohong, Deputy Chief Superintendent (March 26, 2015 – April 24, 2020, Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Public Security and Minister-level)
Qi Yanjun, Deputy Chief Superintendent (April 24, 2020 -, Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Public Security and Minister-level)
Let’s look at the current director of the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau, Qi Yanjun.
He is the deputy mayor of Beijing
How many deputy mayors are there in Beijing?
Just 8
Not many anyway
The current deputy mayors of Beijing are all colleagues, right?

What kind of dormitory are the Chinese Communist Party’s navy talking about? Other people may be involved in the case.
It even got blamed on Bei Zhicheng.

This is all just muddying the waters.

Can’t even wash the floor
This case from beginning to end
In the CCP’s propaganda discourse
There is no word for “beyond suspicion”
There is insufficient evidence and there is no suspicion of guilt.

why?
Because under the circumstances of the case
There is no doubt that there is no such thing as guilt

Isn’t there a saying on the Internet?

Many of the things you take for granted now may have only been around a while ago.

1. Food stamps were only canceled after 1992.
2. Weekends were only implemented in 1995. Before that, there were weekends and weekends, and before that, there were single holidays.
3. After 2002, the supply of goods gradually became more abundant, and many things can be bought with money.
4. In 2003, ordinary people gradually began to use mobile phones, and everyone had one.
5. Agricultural taxes were only abolished in 2006.
6. Taobao only became popular in 2008, and people really began to enjoy the convenience of online shopping.
7. Smartphones have only slowly become popular since 2009.
8. WeChat only appeared in 2011, and people really began to realize convenient communication.
   Therefore, it was not many years before the good times began.

In fact, China has not even touched the floor of civilization.

In 1994, it was beyond the doubt, or to put it nicely,
It’s a lighter punishment.
At that time, the policemen drank heavily every day and were in a drunken state in the afternoon.
After Zhou Yongkang implemented the five prohibitions
The police don’t drink at noon

Now the CCP’s navy is clearing the ground
What the hell? Apart from Sun Wei, there are other people in the dormitory who may be suspects.
Even Bei Zhicheng
but
J
There must be a suspect, but no one has been arrested.
In 1994, how did the Chinese police solve crimes?
If Sun Wei had no background
Just catch him and beat him up.
Obtain confessions to solve crimes
This was the standard police procedure at the time.

On May 8, 2013, the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau published a long Weibo post on its official Weibo “Safe Beijing” to inform the public about the case. It also specifically pointed out that “during its work, the task force always insisted on handling the case fairly and in accordance with the law without any interference.”
this is a joke
At that time, the deputy director of the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau in charge of internal and cultural security was Gao Yu.
Gao Yu also managed economic investigation for a period of time
Gao Yu used to be the deputy director of the 14th Division.
In 2013, Gao Yu, the director of the Beijing Public Security Bureau’s Weibo account, was clarifying for himself
Gao Yu was originally the deputy director of the 14th Division.
In 2013, he jumped out and said that he would handle the case fairly.
From a procedural point of view, it is a conflict of interest.
Such words have no credibility at all.