全球化的骗局
全球化当然有好处，但是这个世界上有什么事情只有好处，没有坏处？这不是反常识吗？
所有经济学教材的头几章都会写一个土豆和牛肉的案例，通过分工能够提高产量
来证明全球化百利而无一害，这纯粹是洗脑的谎言
假设世界上原来只能生产10个土豆，美国8个，中国2个
通过全球化的分工，产量提高到20个土豆，美国14个中国6个
分工的确会导致产量增加，但并不等于财富增加
一个有20个土豆的世界，土豆的价值只有10个土豆的世界的半价。
全球化之前，美国有8个土豆，掌握世界80%的财富
全球化之后，美国有14个土豆，掌握世界70%的财富
因为全球化，美国的财富缩水了，中国的财富增加了。
虽然土豆的产量上去了，但是这对美国没有任何意义
因为美国有8个土豆就能吃的很饱，中国有2个土豆就要饿死
美国要那么多土豆的意义是什么？这不是贪婪吗？
8个土豆就能吃饱，非要14个廉价的土豆？
美国中产阶级1970年代就有冰箱电视汽车等，
现在50年过去了，增加了什么？
一切交易都是有价格的，如果通过全球化贸易美国有16个土豆，中国有4个
这是公平贸易
如果结果是美国有14个，中国有6个，这就是
中国对美国财富的掠夺
如果美国有17个，中国有3个，这才是《美国优先》
美中贸易的实际结果就是中国财富增加，美国财富缩水
美国表面上得到了更多的廉价商品，但是美国财富占世界的比例却在
每况愈下，天天下降
全球化除了养肥共产主义，没有任何积极的意义
不是说全球化的理论就完全错误，但那只是书本上的理论，现实中不存在
那不就是乌托邦，共产主义吗？
经济学假定人是理性的，人真的是理性的吗？
经济学假设的前提就不正确，还在那里论证
全球化假定的公平贸易规则，中国根本就不会遵守。这不就是扯淡吗？
左派扳不倒中国，或者本来就把中共视为战略盟友，不想扳倒
就改成刀口向内，在美国，在英国，在欧洲国内推行共产主义？？
英文翻译
The scam of globalization
Globalization certainly has benefits, but is there anything in this world that has only benefits and no disadvantages? Isn’t this counterintuitive?
The first few chapters of all economics textbooks will write a case of potatoes and beef, and the division of labor can increase production
to prove that globalization has all benefits and no harm, which is a pure brainwashing lie
Suppose the world can only produce 10 potatoes, 8 in the United States and 2 in China
Through the global division of labor, the output is increased to 20 potatoes, 14 in the United States and 6 in China
The division of labor does lead to an increase in output, but it does not mean an increase in wealth
In a world with 20 potatoes, the value of potatoes is only half the price of a world with 10 potatoes.
Before globalization, the United States had 8 potatoes and controlled 80% of the world’s wealth
After globalization, the United States had 14 potatoes and controlled 70% of the world’s wealth
Because of globalization, the wealth of the United States has shrunk, and the wealth of China has increased.
Although the output of potatoes has increased, it does not mean anything to the United States
Because the United States can eat a lot with 8 potatoes, and China will starve to death with 2 potatoes
What is the meaning of the United States having so many potatoes? Isn’t this greed?
8 potatoes can fill you up, why do you need 14 cheap potatoes?
The American middle class had refrigerators, televisions, cars, etc. in the 1970s.
Now 50 years have passed, what has been added?
All transactions have prices. If the United States has 16 potatoes and China has 4 through global trade,
this is fair trade.
If the result is that the United States has 14 and China has 6, this is
China’s plunder of American wealth.
If the United States has 17 and China has 3, this is “America First”.
The actual result of US-China trade is that China’s wealth has increased and the United States’ wealth has shrunk.
On the surface, the United States has obtained more cheap goods, but the proportion of American wealth in the world is
getting worse and worse, decreasing every day.
Globalization has no positive meaning except fattening communism.
It’s not that the theory of globalization is completely wrong, but that is only a theory in books and does not exist in reality.
Isn’t that utopia, communism?
Economics assumes that people are rational. Are people really rational?
The premise of economics is incorrect, and it is still arguing that
China will not abide by the fair trade rules assumed by globalization. Isn’t this nonsense?
The left cannot overthrow China, or they originally regarded the CCP as a strategic ally and did not want to overthrow it. So they turned the knife inward and promoted communism in the United States, Britain, and Europe? ?