赵乐际不但传染王沪宁，还传染了习近平？习近平不断搓手。习近平的手明显肿胀，都无法按投票按钮了
大家好，媒体报道称感染是中国人大委员长赵乐际今天缺席人大关键议会会议的原因。68 岁的赵乐际没有出现在人民大会堂闭幕式的党内高级领导人之列，这是近二十年来，中共最高层政治局常委首次缺席这一备受瞩目的活动。
全国人大常委会副委员长李鸿忠在北京人民大会堂主持全体会议时表示，“赵乐际委员长因呼吸道感染请假，请假参加今天下午的会议。”他说，“我被委托……主持会议。”他告诉聚集在会议大厅主礼堂的 2000 多名代表，会议定于周二结束。
这一声明与中共对高级领导人健康状况的惯例保密不同。有分析师说，“这种情况极为罕见。”“中国全国人大发言人缺席一年中最重要的一次会议当然是不寻常的。”
据官方媒体报道，赵乐际没有出席周一举行的中国全国政协闭幕会议和全国人民代表大会主席团第三次会议，也没有说明他缺席的原因。
在此之前，赵乐际曾经担任中共反腐监察部门负责人五年，出席了所有公开会议。赵乐际在担任中纪委书记期间，抓了大量的习近平的马仔。赵乐际的肖像仍出现在全国人大网站上。
此前中国外交部发言人也曾表示，前外交部长秦刚因未指明的“健康原因”缺席了 2023 年在印度尼西亚举行的外交峰会。后来，他因婚外情神秘缺席一个月，被免职。
政府发言人过去曾表示，自 2006 年以来，政治局常委从未缺席过一次重要的全国人大全体会议。当时，前副总理黄菊因住院生病而缺席了所有年度全国人大会议。黄菊曾是中国第六大领导人，于 2007 年去世，但当局没有透露死因。
共产党几乎从不透露高层领导人的健康状况，也从不谈论他们的年龄问题，这让分析人士难以追踪政治动态。
官方媒体的镜头显示，赵乐际缺席了 2022 年 1 月由习近平主持的 24 名政治局委员的学习会议。没有说明他缺席的原因，官方媒体也没有列出出席人员名单。
不过，有时评人说：如果赵乐际是因为腐败被调查，就不太可能会要他出席二会前半段，主持开幕式和做人大报告，因为如果有问题，不会是二会后半程才发现的，肯定是之前就已经调查了，那怎么允许他前半场参加会议却不让他在后半场露面，完全没有必要。 同理，如果他确实有腐败问题，既然前半场都参加了，后半场让他参加配合著把这个戏演完，这不对当局的观感更好吗，反正他也跑不掉。 所以结论是，缺席二会后半场，不是因腐败问题。大概就是有病吧，硬撑着出席前半段，但后几天撑不住，在家休息或住院。
在3月4日中共全国政协十四届三次会议开幕式上，有网民注意到，王沪宁在演讲时似乎呼吸急促。一名网民评论道：「王沪宁开幕式演讲时，好像鼻子有问题，都是喘息。」
不过，王沪宁仍在3月10日出席并主持了中共全国政协闭幕会，央视画面显示，习近平、李强、蔡奇、丁薛祥、李希等政治局常委及国家副主席韩正均在主席台就座，但赵乐际缺席。
不但王沪宁看起来好像被赵乐际传染了，习近平有可能也被王沪宁传染了。习近平在二会现场，两只手不断地揉搓，看起来很猥琐，感觉习近平当着三千代表的面，就在手冲一样。习近平手这么痒，明显表现出了过敏的症状，有可能习近平被使用了大量激素。
习近平明显是肿了，别的代表的手去按投票器按钮的时候都很灵活。习近平感觉肿的中指已经挡住了食指。感觉习近平手指头胖得都挤在一起了。没法按投票器按钮，就习近平那个手指头肿的，去按投票器的按钮已经比较费劲了。所以习近平才不停的搓手，可能是真的痒痒还是怎么回事儿。
如果习近平也被感染了。那够牛的，一下子感染了三个人，赵乐际，王沪宁，习近平
王沪宁不仅可能被赵乐际传染。连王沪宁的报告都被删改了。
3月10日，中国全国政协十四届三次会议落下帷幕，政协主席王沪宁在闭幕会上发表讲话。然而，令人费解的是，新华社在报道中似乎有意调整了内容。此前，在综合报道中，已删去了最高人民法院院长张军和最高人民检察院检察长应勇讲话中一些明显吹捧习近平的表述。如今，在王沪宁的讲话报道中，新华社同样“修剪”了一些过于奉承的措辞。作为政治局常委的讲话被如此处理，尤其是涉及习近平的部分，绝非小事。
我们不妨先梳理一下被删减的内容。通过查阅中共官网发布的王沪宁讲话全文，可以发现其对习近平的赞颂堪称浓墨重彩。从头到尾，他反复强调习近平对政协的“引领作用”，不仅提及“二四四二”（即“两个确立”“四个意识”“四个自信”“两个维护”），还声称政协委员一致认同，“新时代党和国家之所以能焕发新貌，过去一年在全球变局中之所以能保持‘风景这边独好’，关键在于习近平的掌舵领航和思想指引”。然而，新华社在题为“全国政协十四届三次会议闭幕”的报道中，仅保留了“二四四二”，而将“掌舵领航”“思想指引”等表述悉数剔除。
这让人颇感意外。因为在今年的二会期间，中共高层官员明显在使用一套统一的“赞颂模板”，其中就包括“掌舵领航”“思想指引”等词汇。此前分析认为，这种统一口径的背后，可能是中共内部在会议前达成某种默契，并下达了相关指示。在当前内外压力加大的背景下，高官们如此集中表扬习近平过去一年的工作，不排除有“送别”的意味。如果习近平真的退位，可能会以较为体面的方式进行，既保全其个人形象，也维护中共整体的颜面，进而稳住政权。
从官方媒体的报道来看，包括王沪宁在内的高官在分组讨论时都使用了类似的“赞颂模板”。例如，王沪宁在贵州代表团时也发表了相似的溢美之词。因此，他在闭幕会上延续这一基调似乎并无不妥。然而，新华社却将这些重要的表扬内容删除，实属罕见。
更值得注意的是，王沪宁在讲话中还提到，新的一年要“在政治立场、政治方向、政治原则、政治道路上，与以习近平为核心的党中央保持高度一致”。但新华社的报道却对此只字不提，转而强调“更好担负起落实中共中央决策部署和人民政协工作要求的政治责任”。
这不禁让人好奇：新华社对王沪宁在政协开幕式上的讲话又是如何处理的？对比之下，问题同样明显。
在开幕式讲话中，王沪宁依旧高调赞扬习近平，仿佛没有习近平，政协官员们就失去了方向。他不仅提到“二四四二”和“思想指引”，还称习近平在政协75周年大会上的讲话“高瞻远瞩、深邃精辟、内涵丰富，闪耀着马克思主义基本原理与中国实际及传统文化结合的真理光芒，为新时代政协事业指明了方向、提供了遵循”。如此夸张的表述，在新华社的报道中却被大幅精简，仅保留了“指明方向、提供遵循”这一句。
新华社接连删减政治局常委的溢美之词，这种情况在2024年从未发生。例如，在去年的“全国政协十四届二次会议闭幕”报道中，王沪宁的讲话被完整引用，包括“全体委员高度评价以习近平为核心的党中央团结带领全国人民顽强拼搏、勇毅前行，引领‘中国号’巨轮劈波斩浪”等内容，甚至连“两个确立”的意义也一字不落。此外，他在谈到政协未来工作时提到的“以思想为指导”“提高政治站位”等表述，也都被完整保留。
那么，为何今年二会期间，一方面允许高官使用相似的“赞颂模板”，另一方面却在官方报道中刻意剔除过度的奉承之词？这背后似乎有一股力量在暗中操控。一种可能的解释是，习近平的权力或许已出现动摇，而幕后的中共元老们希望在正式公布前，避免外界过度揣测引发混乱。因此，他们一方面默许高官使用既定脚本，另一方面对某些过于夸张的言辞加以调整。
现在宣传把握的调门就是降温。如果吹的太猛，调子太高，就随便删掉一两句。我看也就是随便删，没有什么特别的规定。就是不要把吹捧习近平的气氛给烘托上去就行。说什么都无所谓。只要别吹太猛就行。吹得太猛新华社就往下删东西。只要删掉一句两句，一对比就会发现不对味了。但是也不能彻底把习近平下架，就是这么不上不下。
王沪宁已经是政治局常委排名第四的人，他的讲话都可以随便删改。就是说明操盘手的政治排名比王沪宁还高。
好的，谢谢大家。
英文翻译
Did Zhao Leji infect not only Wang Huning but also Xi Jinping? Xi Jinping keeps rubbing his hands. Xi Jinping’s hands are visibly swollen and he can’t even press the voting button
Hello everyone, media reports say infection is the reason why Zhao Leji, chairman of China’s NPC, missed a key parliamentary session of the NPC today. Zhao Leji, 68, was not among the party’s top leaders at the closing ceremony at the Great Hall of the People, the first time in nearly two decades that a member of the top Politburo Standing Committee of the Communist Party of China has missed the high-profile event.
“Chairman Zhao Leji has asked for leave due to a respiratory infection to attend this afternoon’s meeting,” said Li Hongzhong, vice chairman of the NPC Standing Committee, as he presided over a plenary session at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. “I have been entrusted … to preside over the meeting,” he said, telling the more than 2,000 delegates gathered in the main auditorium of the conference hall that the meeting is scheduled to end on Tuesday.
The statement is a departure from the party’s customary secrecy about the health of senior leaders. “This is extremely rare,” said an analyst. “It is certainly unusual for a spokesperson for the National People’s Congress of China to be absent from the most important meeting of the year.”
According to official media reports, Zhao Leji did not attend the closing session of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference and the third meeting of the Presidium of the National People’s Congress on Monday, and did not explain the reason for his absence.
Prior to this, Zhao Leji served as the head of the Communist Party’s anti-corruption supervision department for five years and attended all public meetings. During his tenure as secretary of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, Zhao Leji arrested a large number of Xi Jinping’s lackeys. Zhao Leji’s portrait still appears on the website of the National People’s Congress.
Previously, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs also said that former Foreign Minister Qin Gang missed the 2023 diplomatic summit in Indonesia for unspecified “health reasons.” Later, he was mysteriously absent for a month because of an extramarital affair and was removed from office.
Government spokespersons have said in the past that the Politburo Standing Committee has never missed an important National People’s Congress plenary session since 2006. At that time, former Vice Premier Huang Ju missed all annual National People’s Congress meetings due to hospitalization. Huang Ju, once China’s sixth-most powerful leader, died in 2007, but the authorities did not disclose the cause of death.
The Communist Party almost never discloses the health of its top leaders, and never discusses their age, making it difficult for analysts to track political dynamics.
Official media footage showed Zhao Leji absent from a study session of 24 Politburo members chaired by Xi Jinping in January 2022. No reason was given for his absence, and official media did not list the attendees.
However, some commentators said: If Zhao Leji was investigated for corruption, it would be unlikely that he would be asked to attend the first half of the Second Session, preside over the opening ceremony and make a report to the National People’s Congress, because if there was a problem, it would not be discovered in the second half of the Second Session, and it must have been investigated before. Then why was he allowed to attend the first half of the meeting but not allowed to show up in the second half? It was completely unnecessary. Similarly, if he did have a corruption problem, since he participated in the first half, wouldn’t it be better for the authorities to let him participate in the second half to cooperate in the show and finish it? Anyway, he can’t run away. So the conclusion is that the absence from the second half of the second session was not due to corruption. Maybe he was sick, so he insisted on attending the first half, but couldn’t hold on for the next few days, so he had to rest at home or be hospitalized.
At the opening ceremony of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference on March 4, some netizens noticed that Wang Huning seemed to be breathing rapidly during his speech. One netizen commented: “When Wang Huning gave his opening speech, it seemed that there was something wrong with his nose, and he was gasping.”
However, Wang Huning still attended and presided over the closing meeting of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference on March 10. CCTV footage showed that Xi Jinping, Li Qiang, Cai Qi, Ding Xuexiang, Li Xi and other members of the Political Bureau Standing Committee and Vice President Han Zheng were all seated on the rostrum, but Zhao Leji was absent.
Not only did Wang Huning seem to be infected by Zhao Leji, but Xi Jinping might have also been infected by Wang Huning. At the scene of the second session, Xi Jinping kept rubbing his hands, which looked very obscene. It felt like Xi Jinping was masturbating in front of 3,000 representatives. Xi Jinping’s hands were so itchy, and he clearly showed symptoms of allergy. It is possible that Xi Jinping was given a lot of hormones.
Xi Jinping’s hands were obviously swollen. Other representatives were very flexible when they tried to press the voting button. Xi Jinping felt that his swollen middle finger had blocked his index finger. It felt like Xi Jinping’s fingers were so fat that they were squeezed together. He couldn’t press the voting button. Xi Jinping’s fingers were swollen, and it was difficult to press the voting button. That’s why Xi Jinping kept rubbing his hands. Maybe he was really itchy or something.
If Xi Jinping was also infected. That’s amazing. Three people were infected at once, Zhao Leji, Wang Huning, and Xi Jinping
Wang Huning may not only be infected by Zhao Leji. Even Wang Huning’s report was deleted.
On March 10, the third session of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference came to an end, and Wang Huning, chairman of the CPPCC, delivered a speech at the closing ceremony. However, it is puzzling that Xinhua News Agency seemed to have deliberately adjusted the content in its report. Previously, in the comprehensive report, some statements that obviously flattered Xi Jinping in the speeches of Zhang Jun, President of the Supreme People’s Court, and Ying Yong, Procurator-General of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, had been deleted. Now, in the report of Wang Huning’s speech, Xinhua News Agency also “trimmed” some overly flattering words. It is no small matter that the speech of a member of the Politburo Standing Committee was handled in this way, especially the part involving Xi Jinping.
Let’s sort out the deleted content first. By reading the full text of Wang Huning’s speech released on the official website of the Communist Party of China, it can be found that his praise for Xi Jinping is very rich. From beginning to end, he repeatedly emphasized Xi Jinping’s “leading role” in the CPPCC, not only mentioning “2442” (that is, “two establishments”, “four consciousnesses”, “four confidences” and “two maintenances”), but also claiming that CPPCC members unanimously agreed that “the reason why the party and the country in the new era can be renewed and why they can maintain the “unique scenery here” in the global changes in the past year is that the key lies in Xi Jinping’s steering and ideological guidance”. However, in the report entitled “The Third Session of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Concludes”, Xinhua News Agency only retained “2442” and eliminated all expressions such as “steering” and “ideological guidance”.
This is quite surprising. Because during this year’s two sessions, senior CCP officials were clearly using a unified “praise template”, which included words such as “steering the ship” and “ideological guidance”. Previous analysis believed that behind this unified tone, there may be a tacit understanding reached within the CCP before the meeting and relevant instructions were issued. Under the current background of increasing internal and external pressure, the fact that senior officials praised Xi Jinping’s work in the past year so intensively cannot be ruled out as a “farewell” meaning. If Xi Jinping really abdicates, it may be done in a more decent way, which not only preserves his personal image, but also maintains the face of the CCP as a whole, and thus stabilizes the regime.
According to official media reports, senior officials including Wang Huning used similar “praise templates” during group discussions. For example, Wang Huning also made similar praises when he was in the Guizhou delegation. Therefore, it seems that there is nothing wrong with him continuing this tone at the closing meeting. However, Xinhua News Agency deleted these important praises, which is rare.
What is more noteworthy is that Wang Huning also mentioned in his speech that in the new year, “in terms of political stance, political direction, political principles, and political path, we must maintain a high degree of consistency with the Party Central Committee with Xi Jinping as the core.” However, the Xinhua News Agency’s report did not mention this at all, and instead emphasized “better shouldering the political responsibility of implementing the decisions and arrangements of the CPC Central Committee and the work requirements of the CPPCC.”
This makes people curious: How did Xinhua News Agency deal with Wang Huning’s speech at the opening ceremony of the CPPCC? In contrast, the problem is equally obvious.
In his speech at the opening ceremony, Wang Huning still praised Xi Jinping in a high-profile manner, as if without Xi Jinping, CPPCC officials would lose their direction. He not only mentioned “2442” and “ideological guidance”, but also said that Xi Jinping’s speech at the 75th anniversary of the CPPCC was “far-sighted, profound and insightful, rich in connotation, shining with the truth of combining the basic principles of Marxism with China’s reality and traditional culture, and pointing out the direction and providing guidance for the CPPCC cause in the new era.” Such an exaggerated statement was greatly simplified in the Xinhua News Agency’s report, retaining only the sentence “pointing out the direction and providing guidance.”
Xinhua News Agency has deleted the flattering words of the Politburo Standing Committee members one after another, which has never happened in 2024. For example, in the report of the “Closing of the Second Session of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference” last year, Wang Huning’s speech was quoted in full, including “All members highly praised the Party Central Committee with Xi Jinping as the core for uniting and leading the people of the country to fight tenaciously and move forward courageously, leading the giant ship of “China” to cut through the waves”, and even the meaning of “two establishments” was not omitted. In addition, his expressions such as “guided by ideology” and “improving political standing” when talking about the future work of the CPPCC were also fully retained.
So why did senior officials allow similar “praise templates” during the second session this year, but deliberately eliminate excessive flattery in official reports? There seems to be a force behind this. One possible explanation is that Xi Jinping’s power may have been shaken, and the CCP elders behind the scenes hope to avoid excessive speculation from the outside world before the official announcement to cause chaos. Therefore, on the one hand, they acquiesced to senior officials using established scripts, and on the other hand, they adjusted some overly exaggerated words.
The tone of the propaganda now is to cool down. If the praise is too strong, the tone is too high, just delete one or two sentences at random. I think it is just to delete at random, there is no special rule. Just don’t create an atmosphere of flattering Xi Jinping. It doesn’t matter what you say. Just don’t praise too much. If it praises too much, Xinhua News Agency will delete things. Just delete one or two sentences, and you will find that it is not right when you compare it. But Xi Jinping cannot be completely removed from the shelf, it is just like this.
Wang Huning is already the fourth member of the Politburo Standing Committee, and his speech can be deleted and modified at will. It means that the political ranking of the manipulator is higher than Wang Huning.
OK, thank you everyone.