蔡奇胆子太大了居然搞一个习近平的替身，准确的说是彭丽媛胆子太大了，蔡奇肯定不敢做主
大家好
蔡奇胆子太大了居然搞一个习近平的替身，准确的说是彭丽媛胆子太大了，蔡奇肯定不敢做主。
越南的阮富仲，开倒车，越南本来就是一个独裁国家，但是稍微分权一点点，搞一个四驾马车，四位越南共产党的高层人士，寡头垄断权力
结果到了阮富仲这里，就像开倒车，拆散四驾马车，一个人独裁
中国共产党，也是独裁政党，搞了一个隔代指定，10年的任期制，结果江泽民胡锦涛坚持了才两任，到习包子这里就变成了终身制。
现在阮富仲嗝屁了
可能在召唤同样开倒车的习近平吧
看样子习近平也够呛的
已经有人质疑去越南驻中国大使馆吊唁的习近平
长得和以前的习包子长得不像
今天我给大家分析一下更实锤的证据
习近平的笔迹，和习近平八年前的笔迹
根本就不是一个人写的。
大家知道
在中国笔迹鉴定在中国的公安局，法院的法律效力
那是和DNA差不多的法律效力的。
就算是一个人模仿另外一个人的签名，公安局做笔记鉴定
立马就穿帮了
而2016年的习近平和
2024年的习近平
连签名签得都不一样
2016年去古巴大使馆吊唁卡斯特罗的习近平
和2024年7月20日去越南大使馆吊唁阮富仲的习近平
根本就不是一个人
因为这两个习近平的笔迹完全不同
连习近平这三个字，写的都不一样
我们看一下2016年的习近平写的是
沉痛悼念古巴人民
而2024年这个习近平写的是
沉痛悼念越南人民
首先这个沉痛的沉，写的就不一样
原来习近平的写法是
这个沉那个宝盖上面是个圆，右边是个圆的
现在变成了一个钩
原来沉左边是只往下写下了一半
现在是完全写下来了，是一竖了
原来习近平沉痛悼念的痛
痛左边那两个点写成了一个钩
现在写成了一个竖
原来沉痛的痛下面是个用法的用
原来是一个圆圈，画了一个圆圈
现在变成了一个方的钩
就一看这个字，没有一个字写的是一样的
根本就不是一个人写的
包括沉痛悼念的悼
跟原来写的也不一样
原来他那个竖，横竖，那个笔的走势
你就照着习近平写的他的写法描一下
一看就是两个人写的
你包括沉痛悼念的念
这个念写稍微有点像
但是你看这个两个字
上面一个今，下面一个心
这个字的间距就完全不一样
字的结构的写法就完全不一样
就是现在的这个假习近平
完全是模仿原来的那个习近平
但是模仿的只有形似，没有神似
你包括人民的人
原来他是左边这个人直接勾过去的
而往上一挑，现在的左边这个人
这个笔是竖过去的，横着过去的
原来习近平写的人民的民
上面那个是两个点
现在变成了一个半圆勾过来的
原来的习近平写的民是往右下撇的
现在变成了横着的了
就没有一个字他写的是一样的
最明显的就是这个《杰出》的《出》
原来习近平写的《杰出》的《出》
这个《出》字就是印刷体的
现在变成了一个连体的
就完全不一样了
包括《杰出》的《杰》
下面这四个点
原来习近平写的是一个弯上去往下一勾
现在就连着随便写了一个
就没有一个字写的是一样的
仔细看，包括《领袖》的《领》，《袖》
《中国人民》
这个《中》原来习近平写的是两个横
两个横连着写
现在变成了往上一勾
最明显的就是这个竖的写法
习近平一般写法这个竖
他不往一边偏
现在这个习近平写的竖是往一边偏的
你包括《国》
他们就没有一个字能写的一样
就看上去有一点点像，但是不一样
让做笔迹鉴定的人一看就是不一样
你包括《伟大朋友》
这几个字是最简单的几个字
你看上去是有那么一点点像
好像是一个人写的，但是你仔细看
你看这个《伟大》的《伟》，那个笔锋的走势
它原来是一个三角往上一勾
现在是往上一个圈勾上去
反而《伟》原来是往下勾的
现在它写上一个圈了
你包括这个《朋友》的《朋》
原来的习近平写的都是
那个竖就是一竖下来
现在这个竖就是拐弯了
是眼睛不行了还是这个手没劲了
写的完全就不一样
你包括《朋友》的《友》
它原来就是这一个插中间的勾的那个圈
比较小，现在变大了
就是整个字的结构它就不一样了
包括原来写的卡斯特罗同志
现在是阮富仲同志
就没有一个字是一样的
最大的穿帮就是习近平这三个字
它写的不一样
签名能写成不一样的吗？
八年习近平跟签名都签成不一样的吗？
原来它那个《近平》的《近》是往上勾的
现在就基本上变成横的了
《平》的写法走势，笔锋和原来的也完全不一样
包括下面这个数字
它就没有一个能写成一样的
英文翻译
Cai Qi is so bold that he actually created a substitute for Xi Jinping. To be precise, it is Peng Liyuan who is so bold. Cai Qi certainly does not dare to make the decision.
Hello everyone
Cai Qi is so bold that he actually created a substitute for Xi Jinping. To be precise, it is Peng Liyuan who is so bold. Cai Qi certainly does not dare to make the decision.
Vietnam’s Nguyen Phu Trong is going backwards. Vietnam is originally a dictatorship, but it has decentralized power a little bit and created a troika. Four senior officials of the Communist Party of Vietnam monopolize power.
As a result, when it comes to Nguyen Phu Trong, it is like going backwards, dismantling the troika and becoming a dictator
The Chinese Communist Party is also a dictatorship. It has created a 10-year term system for intergenerational designation. As a result, Jiang Zemin and Hu Jintao insisted on only two terms. When it comes to Xi Baozi, it has become a lifelong system.
Now that Nguyen Phu Trong has died, he may be calling for Xi Jinping, who is also going backwards. It seems that Xi Jinping is in trouble. Some people have questioned that Xi Jinping, who went to the Vietnamese Embassy in China to pay his respects, does not look like the old Xi Baozi. Today I will analyze more solid evidence for you. Xi Jinping’s handwriting and Xi Jinping’s handwriting eight years ago are not written by the same person. As you know, in China, handwriting identification has legal effect in the police station and court in China. It has the same legal effect as DNA. Even if one person imitates another person’s signature, the public security bureau will immediately expose it when they take notes and identify it.
And Xi Jinping in 2016 and Xi Jinping in 2024 do not even sign the same names.
The Xi Jinping who went to the Cuban Embassy in 2016 to mourn Castro and the Xi Jinping who went to the Vietnamese Embassy on July 20, 2024 to mourn Nguyen Phu Trong are not the same person at all.
Because the handwriting of these two Xi Jinpings is completely different.
Even the three words “Xi Jinping” are written differently.
Let’s take a look at what Xi Jinping wrote in 2016: “Deeply mourn the Cuban people” and what Xi Jinping wrote in 2024: “Deeply mourn the Vietnamese people”.
First of all, the “deeply mourning” in “deeply mourning” is written differently.
Originally, the way Xi Jinping wrote “deeply mourning” was that the “treasure cover” had a circle on the top and a circle on the right.
Now it has become a hook.
Originally, the left side of “deeply mourning” was only written halfway down.
Now it is completely written down, with a vertical line.
Originally, the two dots on the left side of “deeply mourning” in “deeply mourning” were written as a hook.
Now it is written as a vertical line.
Originally, under the character “痛” in “沉痛” was a character “用” in “用”.
Originally, it was a circle.
Now it has become a square hook.
When you look at this character, no character is written the same.
It is not written by the same person at all.
Including the character “哀” in “沉痛叨念”.
It is also different from the original one.
Originally, the vertical, horizontal and vertical strokes of the pen.
Just trace it according to the way Xi Jinping wrote it.
It is obvious that it was written by two people.
Including the character “念” in “沉痛叨念”.
This character is written a little similarly.
But if you look at these two characters.
There is a “今” on the top and a “心” on the bottom.
The spacing between these characters is completely different.
The writing of the character structure is completely different.
This fake Xi Jinping now is completely imitating the original Xi Jinping.
But the imitation is only similar in form, not in spirit.
Including the character “人民人人”.
Originally, he used the character on the left to directly hook it.
But if you move it upward, the character on the left now
The pen moves vertically and horizontally.
Originally, the character “民” in “人民” written by Xi Jinping had two dots on the top.
Now it has become =The word “民” written by Xi Jinping originally had a right lower left stroke. Now it has become horizontal. No word he writes the same. The most obvious one is the “出” in “过于” written by Xi Jinping. The “出” in “过于” was originally printed. Now it has become a connected one. It is completely different. Including the “杰” in “过于” The four dots below. Xi Jinping originally wrote it with a curved upward and downward stroke. Now he just wrote one randomly. No word is written the same. Look carefully, including the “領” in “領” and “袖” in “領領” and “人民” in “人民”. Xi Jinping originally wrote the “中” with two horizontal strokes. The two horizontal strokes were connected. Now it has become a hook upward. The most obvious one is the vertical stroke. Xi Jinping usually writes this vertical stroke. He does not lean to one side. Now the vertical stroke written by Xi Jinping leans to one side. Including “国” They can’t write a single word the same. They look a little bit similar, but they are different. Let’s do handwriting identification The people who have decided to write are different at first glance.
Including “Great Friends”, these words are the simplest words. They look a little bit similar. It seems that they were written by the same person, but if you look carefully, the “Wei” in “Great”, the trend of the pen stroke. It used to be a triangle with a hook upwards. Now it is a circle upwards. On the contrary, “Wei” used to be a hook downwards. Now it is written in a circle. Including the “Peng” in “Friends”, Xi Jinping used to write the vertical stroke straight down. Now it is a curve. Is it because his eyes are not good or his hands are weak? The writing is completely different. Including the “You” in “Friends”, it used to be a circle with a hook in the middle. It was smaller, but now it is bigger. The structure of the whole word is different. Including the original “Comrade Castro”, now it is “Comrade Nguyen Phu Trong”. No word is the same. The biggest mistake is the three words “Xi Jinping”. They are written differently. Can the signature be written differently? Has Xi Jinping signed differently from his signature in the past eight years? Originally, the character “近” in “近平” was hooked upwards. Now it is basically horizontal. The writing style and stroke of “平” are completely different from the original. Including the following number, none of them can be written the same.