2012年7月31日勤务检查情况汇总
7月31日勤务检查情况汇总
31日，指挥中心在对各分县局视频点名中，各单位均能保证人员在岗在位。在对城区一、二级巡逻网巡逻车抽查点名中，未应答的单位有：莲湖208。在对全局电台值守点名中未应答的单位有：反恐处。
7月31日当日情况
警情综述：
▲全天共受理各类报警7，709起。其中：
110：接警4，622起，其中刑事241起（两抢11起，盗窃183起），治安468起，咨询求助907起。
119：接警657起，火灾报警337起，处警5起。
122：接警2430起，有效警情402起，处置71起，伤13人，损失45.3万元。
网络言论自由的边界——评英国少年辱骂戴利被捕事件
新浪体育讯：当地时间7月31日，英国一少年在“推特”上辱骂英国跳水名将戴利，于31日被英国警方逮捕。可能面临“恶意通讯”的指控。新浪体育特约上海纽迈律师事务所方正宇律师，对这一起事件进行评点：
由于涉嫌在推特上侮辱英国跳水运动员戴利，一名年仅17岁的英国少年近日遭到警方拘捕。
根据目前的报道显示，在戴利无缘奖牌之后，这位少年曾以“你令父亲蒙羞”之类的言论，攻击父亲刚在去年不幸去世的戴利。结果非但有数千名网友要求推特封其账号，更是惊动了英国警方凌晨时分在酒店里将其捉拿归案。
仅仅因为在网络上骂了几句，就有可能面临牢狱之灾？这种情况在英国其实并不算新鲜。
还记得今年3月在英超赛场上突然晕倒的姆万巴吗？当时在意外发生之后，有一名大学生先是在推特上冒充姆万巴的主治医生，并且宣布了后者死亡的消息。接下来在揭穿之后，他又在推特上对于姆万巴进行了言语侮辱。结果在接到其他网友举报之后，当地警方迅速拘捕了此人。3月27日，法庭以扰乱公共秩序罪判处他入狱56天。
以上这些案例是在提醒大家，必须为各自的网络言论承担相应责任，而这与“言论自由”的精神之间并不存在矛盾。因为所谓的“言论自由”，必须建立在不侵害他人合法权益的基础上。那又如何确定具体的边界呢？
比如，对于某些问题存在怀疑，提出怀疑并且展示相应依据属“言论自由”，但就此妄加判断甚至制造谣言则可能构成侵权。具体到本次事件中，对于运动员的糟糕表现提出批评属“言论自由”，但侮辱对方乃至家人则可能构成侵权。所以说，“言论自由”绝不意味着可以肆意践踏他人的感情和尊严。倘若将这两者混为一谈，将导致整个社会环境变得混乱不堪。
值得一提的是，随着网络技术的发展，人际之间的交流方式也在发生改变，出现了越来越多的在线交流。与以往那种面对面的冲突相比，网络上似乎更容易出现相互谩骂的情况。在有些网友看来，这只是虚拟世界中的一种生存方式，并不等同于现实生活中那些有悖法律和道德的言行。
但实际上，构建在网络基础上的言语攻击，其杀伤力有时反而大于当面谩骂。因为这些出现在网上的言论，往往存在着很强的辐射效应，会引起广泛人群的围观。尤其在如今最流行的社交网络，相关内容更是有可能在短时间内获得大量转发，从而扩散对于受害者的伤害。包括在本次戴利受辱的事件中，伴随着对于这位少年所述内容的转发，还有无数人跟进对于戴利进行谩骂，甚至有人扬言要当面教训戴利。
由此可见，一些看似只是为了宣泄个人情绪的网络言辞，最后却有可能形成对于某些对象的严重伤害。正因为如此，英国警方才会以采取强制措施的方式，来维护健康的社会秩序和言论环境。未来倘若这位少年在经过审判之后承担刑责，那么需要从中吸取教训的，远远不只是他一个人。
相关图书
本文链接
英文机翻
Summary of duty inspection on July 31, 2012
Summary of duty inspection on July 31
On the 31st, during the video roll call of the sub-county bureaus by the command center, each unit can ensure that the personnel are on duty. In the spot check and roll call of the patrol cars of the first and second patrol networks in the urban area, the units that did not respond were: Lianhu 208. Units that did not respond to the roll call of the global station are: Anti-terrorism Department.
What happened on July 31st
Summary of police situation:
▲ A total of 7,709 alarms were received throughout the day. in:
110: 4,622 calls to the police, including 241 criminal cases (11 cases of robbery and 183 cases of theft), 468 cases of public security, and 907 cases of consultation and help.
119: 657 calls to the police, 337 fire calls, 5 calls to the police.
122: 2,430 cases were received, 402 cases were effectively reported to the police, 71 cases were dealt with, 13 people were injured, and the loss was 453,000 yuan.
The Boundary of Freedom of Speech on the Internet——Comment on the Arrest of British Teenager Abusing Daly
Sina Sports News: On July 31 local time, a British teenager insulted British diving star Daley on Twitter and was arrested by the British police on the 31st. May face charges of “malicious communications”. Sina Sports specially invited Fang Zhengyu, a lawyer from Shanghai Newman Law Firm, to comment on this incident:
A 17-year-old British teenager has been arrested by police for allegedly insulting British diver Daley on Twitter.
According to current reports, after Daly missed the medal, the teenager attacked Daly, whose father had just passed away last year, with remarks such as “You shame your father”. As a result, not only did thousands of netizens ask Twitter to block his account, but even the British police arrested him in the hotel in the early hours of the morning.
Just because of swearing a few words on the Internet, it is possible to face jail time? This situation is not new in the UK.
Remember Mwamba who suddenly fainted in the Premier League in March this year? After the accident, a college student first pretended to be Mwamba’s attending doctor on Twitter and announced the death of the latter. Then, after debunking it, he verbally insulted Mwamba on Twitter. As a result, after receiving reports from other netizens, the local police quickly arrested the person. On March 27, the court sentenced him to 56 days in prison for disturbing public order.
These cases above remind everyone that they must bear corresponding responsibilities for their online speech, and there is no contradiction between this and the spirit of “freedom of speech”. Because the so-called “freedom of speech” must be based on not infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of others. Then how to determine the specific boundaries?
For example, if there are doubts about certain issues, it is “free speech” to raise doubts and show the corresponding basis, but to make judgments or even create rumors may constitute infringement. Specifically in this incident, criticizing the poor performance of athletes is “freedom of speech”, but insulting the other party or even family members may constitute a violation of rights. Therefore, “freedom of speech” does not mean that you can wantonly trample on the feelings and dignity of others. If these two are confused, the whole social environment will become chaotic.
It is worth mentioning that with the development of network technology, the way of communication between people is also changing, and more and more online communication has appeared. There seems to be more mutual abuse online than the face-to-face conflicts of old. In the eyes of some netizens, this is just a way of survival in the virtual world, which is not equivalent to those words and deeds that are against the law and morality in real life.
But in fact, verbal attacks built on the basis of the Internet are sometimes more lethal than face-to-face abuse. Because these remarks that appear on the Internet often have a strong radiation effect, which will cause a wide range of people to watch. Especially on today’s most popular social networks, relevant content is likely to be reposted in a large number in a short period of time, thereby spreading the harm to the victim. Including the incident of Daly being humiliated this time, along with the forwarding of the contents of the teenager, countless people followed up and abused Daley, and some even threatened to teach Daley face to face.
It can be seen that some online speeches that seem to be just to vent personal emotions may eventually cause serious harm to certain objects. Because of this, the British police will take coercive measures to maintain a healthy social order and speech environment. In the future, if this young man bears criminal responsibility after being tried, he is far from the only one who needs to learn from it.