搞笑文章：习近平是改良派。2013年说习近平是毛左派算先知吗？
编者按：我转发这篇文章是因为这篇文章里面说，庹震是刘云山、胡春华、胡锦涛的亲信，似乎是靠谱的说法。另外，说《习近平是改良派》，太搞笑了，这节目效果。还有，《张国堂、周亚辉等人在吹捧胡锦涛之余，闭着眼睛硬说习近平是“毛左派”》。我不知道，张国堂和周亚辉是谁，但是，2013年说习近平是毛左派算先知吗？
红色中国网’s Archiver
论坛 › 红色社区 › “南周”事件反映出胡锦涛顽固派势力对习近平改良的猖狂
龙翔五洲 发表于 2013-1-7 10:38:13
“南周”事件反映出胡锦涛顽固派势力对习近平改良的猖狂
“南周”事件反映出胡锦涛顽固派势力对习近平改良的猖狂阻挠
曾节明（中国社会民主党副秘书长）
最近，广东省委宣传部长庹震以一系列狂悖倒退的言行，恰如程咬金抡起的大斧，将习近平二次“南巡”掀起的新改良氛围砍得七零八落：
庹震先是于去年十二月习近平访广东和深圳时，指令广东等地报纸不许“借题发挥”，过多吹捧，更不许联想，他对宣传部干部说，习近平可能只是作秀，他是来缅怀自己父亲的，和中央政策没关，如果我们宣传过火，就把习近平摆上台，“他下不来，我们就上不去”。庹震还对新华社的领导说，习近平再这样折腾，要就是被逼下台，要就是成为“末代黄帝”。 庹震更担心习近平成为“末代皇帝”，他倒不在乎习近平下台，他甚至张狂地表露，习近平就应该下，“习近平能够干五年已经不错了”。
庹震放言：习近平之所以能够上位，无非是有习仲勋这样的老子，一副全不把习近平放在眼里的狂态；庹震还嚣张地辱骂习近平的父亲习仲勋说：就是以现在的标准来评判，宣判他（习仲勋）颠覆国家可能看得起他了，顶多就是一个汉奸、叛徒。这种话对习近平来说，无疑是奇耻大辱。
元旦前夕，庹震甚至亲自上阵，强行撤换《南方周末》高举宪法推进政改的新年献词，代之自己亲自撰写的胡共式蛮横僵硬党八股献词，一手引发了恶劣的“南周”事件，绵延至今。
众多评论者认为：这些现象源于顽固派分子庹震的狂妄和野心，这是大错。庹震不过一个河南省省级共产党衙内出身，赴粤之前也只曾是经济日报社总编辑与新华社副社长，这在北京根本算不上什么大不了的官，庹震何以敢如此嚣张？没有后台是不可能的。庹震的后台，就是把他提携到广东宣传位置上的胡锦涛宣传系势力，被“誉为”新闻界死敌的现任中宣部长、团派干将刘云山，一直是胡锦涛亲信。庹震现在的后台，就是信任广东省委书记、胡锦涛属意的“第六代领导人”胡春华。
古话说：“物以类聚，人以群分”，庹震与刘云山、胡春华、胡锦涛在理念上高度一致，就是狂热崇拜毛泽东、骨子里信奉极权专政，对一切“自由化”怀有天然的、刻骨的仇恨。庹震对别人不感冒，唯独热烈地投入胡春华的怀抱，决不是一时冲动或偶然。
观察人士决不能忽略庹震猖狂出格倒行逆施的背景，是胡团派“太子”胡春华的新近主政广东：随着胡春华的到来，广东的人权状况急剧倒退、媒体言论空间大幅萎缩，全省掀起了大抓异议维权人士的逆流。细究不难发现：胡锦涛的爱将胡春华、刘奇葆、张庆黎走到哪里，哪里就特别专制和黑暗。政评人士朱建国先生以汪洋穿中山装、胡春华穿西装为据，说胡春华比汪洋开明，这实在是本末倒置的胡评。事实证明：汪洋“腾笼换鸟”的经济理念固然是错误的，但他在政治上比胡春华开明得多。这也是汪洋未能受胡锦涛提携入常的主要原因。
庹震对习近平“南巡”舆论连续大力狙击，反映了胡锦涛顽固派势力正竭力阻止开明的“南方系”媒体，为习近平重启改革（改良）呐喊助威，以防止“习南巡”形成“邓南巡”式的效应，此种政治法术之阴毒和精细，打上了鲜明的胡锦涛印记。
胡锦涛、刘云山、胡春华、庹震一伙还利用利用广大贪官对习近平网络反腐的憎恨，向习近平发起疯狂的反扑；与之同时，十八大前十年间向来低调的胡锦涛，突然高调无比，顶着国家主席的最后名号全国四处走动，发表面瘫辅导员式的僵尸讲话，一心要抢习近平的风头，给顽固派贪官撑腰打气。
与之同时，刘云山主持胡记宣传系利用习近平对网络反腐的“无序”及失控的担心，在全国范围内紧急刹车网络反腐、封杀“南周”事件发酵，下一步即时对习近平路线大举反攻——这种抓住习近平的短板倒习相当精明和阴险。
胡团派还故伎重施，元月四日，宣传系指令工业和信息化部关闭了炎黄春秋网站，其实早在2010年8月30日，炎黄春秋的备案号即被取消接入了，当时主政者是胡锦涛，选择这个时候突然关掉《炎黄春秋》网站，用意很明显，就是打击支持习近平改良的党内开明派，顺带嫁祸习近平，装孙子栽赃嫁祸是胡锦涛的一贯伎俩。
胡锦涛倒习的目的，就是架空习近平，让胡春华提前上位。
张国堂、周亚辉等人在吹捧胡锦涛之余，闭着眼睛硬说习近平是“毛左派”，但庹震对习近平咬牙切齿的攻击，再一次从反面证明了习近平决不是顽固派，而真心实意推动中共国走向开明的改良派领导人，他的改良新政遭到胡锦涛顽固派势力的猖狂阻挠和反扑，他的执政地位遭到严重威胁。
面对这种形势，习近平最近在党校讲话时，既高唱改革开放必须有新的突破，又抛出：不能割裂六十年的建国史看问题，指后毛时代三十多年的“改革开放”与毛泽东时代非根本对立，而毛文革等灾难是中国共产党在探索中犯的错误。这是他企图稳住顽固派的策略之举，如果稳住顽固派是为了积蓄力量、下一步对顽固派采取措施，这不失为明智的选择；但如果想藉此讨好顽固派，谋求党内“和谐”，那就大错了。
关于党内团结，毛泽东曾说：“在斗争中求团结，则团结存；在妥协中求团结，则团结亡”，这话在宪政民主国家是荒谬野蛮的，但在一个极权政党中却是千真万确的真理。
因此，习近平下一步必须严惩庹震一伙，否则断不足以立威！如果连庹震这样一个省部级的宣传系党棍都可以随意公开侮辱和攻击国家一把手，而不到任何惩处，今后谁还会把习近平放在眼里？如果这样，习近平必然很快威信扫地，真的就会应验那帮庹震等恶棍宵小的叫嚣“能干完五年就不错了！”
马基雅维利在《君王论》中指出：如果统治者遭到普遍的憎恨，他们的统治还可以维持（如通过恐怖、分化瓦解反对者等等），但若统治者遭到普遍的轻视，他们一定垮台。
政治家要有所作为，首先就必须保住权力，当年江泽民为了巩固权力，敢于扳倒“六四”“功臣”陈希同；胡锦涛为了抓权，也敢于打倒不把自己放在眼里的陈良宇；如今你习近平抓一个庹震算什么？我实在告诉你习近平：严惩庹震和几个胡锦涛宣传系贪官，再次大力推动国内媒体网络“反腐”，并把“反腐风暴”引向胡锦涛顽固派集团，则亿万民众痛恨的政敌势力很快垮台，刘云山、胡春华一伙唯有缴枪投降、俯首听命！
从力量对比上来说，习近平现在必须推动网络和媒体开明化，因为胡锦涛一伙以朝鲜、古巴式的极权倒退政治保卫广大贪官党棍杀人犯们的特权既得利益，十年来深得众官的欢心；习近平要想改变力量对比，就得学当年邓小平利用民主墙倒华国锋：团结党内外开明派和知识精英，安抚维权民众，向顽固派势力发起自下而上的攻势。
曾节明（中国社会民主党副秘书长） 写于2013年元月六日于冰雪纽约州
英文翻译
Funny article: Xi Jinping is a reformist. Does calling Xi Jinping a Maoist leftist in 2013 count as a prophet?
Editor’s note: I am forwarding this article because it says that Tuo Zhen is a close confidant of Liu Yunshan, Hu Chunhua, and Hu Jintao, which seems to be a reliable statement. In addition, it is too funny to say “Xi Jinping is a reformist” and the effect of this program. Also, “Zhang Guotang, Zhou Yahui and others, while praising Hu Jintao, insist that Xi Jinping is a “Maoist leftist” with their eyes closed.” I don’t know who Zhang Guotang and Zhou Yahui are, but is it a prophet to say that Xi Jinping is a Maoist leftist in 2013?
Red China Net’s Archiver
Forum › Red Community › The “Southern Zhou” incident reflects the rampant power of Hu Jintao’s die-hard forces against Xi Jinping’s reforms
Longxiang Wuzhou published on 2013-1-7 10:38:13
The “Southern Zhou” incident reflects the rampant influence of Hu Jintao’s die-hard forces against Xi Jinping’s reforms
The “Southern Zhou” incident reflects the rampant obstruction of Hu Jintao’s die-hard forces to Xi Jinping’s reforms
Zeng Jieming (Deputy Secretary-General of the Chinese Social Democratic Party)
Recently, Tuo Zhen, the Propaganda Minister of the Guangdong Provincial Party Committee, has used a series of wildly regressive words and deeds, just like the ax wielded by Cheng Yaojin, cutting into pieces the new reform atmosphere set off by Xi Jinping’s second “southern tour”:
First, when Xi Jinping visited Guangdong and Shenzhen in December last year, Tuo Zhen ordered newspapers in Guangdong and other places not to “use the topic”, flatter too much, let alone make associations. He told the Propaganda Department cadres that Xi Jinping might just be putting on a show and that he was here to commemorate himself. Father, it has nothing to do with the central government’s policy. If we overdo our propaganda, we will put Xi Jinping on the stage. “If he can’t get down, we won’t be able to get up.” Tuo Zhen also told the leaders of Xinhua News Agency that if Xi Jinping keeps doing this, he will either be forced to step down or become the “last Yellow Emperor.” Tuo Zhen is even more worried about Xi Jinping becoming the “last emperor”. He doesn’t care about Xi Jinping stepping down. He even arrogantly expressed that Xi Jinping should step down. “It’s good for Xi Jinping to be in power for five years.”
Tuo Zhen said frankly: The reason why Xi Jinping came to power is simply because he has an old man like Xi Zhongxun, who does not take Xi Jinping seriously at all. Tuo Zhen also arrogantly insulted Xi Jinping’s father, Xi Zhongxun, saying: “It’s based on today’s standards.” Judgment, declaring him (Xi Zhongxun) subversive to the country may look down on him, at best he is a traitor and traitor. Such words are undoubtedly a great shame and humiliation for Xi Jinping.
On the eve of New Year’s Day, Tuo Zhen even went to battle in person and forcibly replaced the New Year’s message of Southern Weekend, which held high the constitution and promoted political reform, and replaced it with a speech written by himself, which was the brutal and rigid stereotype of the Hu Communist Party. This single-handedly triggered the vicious “Southern Zhou” incident. continues to this day.
Many commentators believe that these phenomena stem from the arrogance and ambition of the die-hard Tuo Zhen, which is a big mistake. Tuo Zhen was born in a provincial Communist Party office in Henan Province. Before going to Guangdong, he was only the editor-in-chief of the Economic Daily and the vice president of Xinhua News Agency. This is not a big official in Beijing. How could Tuo Zhen dare to be so arrogant? It’s impossible without the backend. Tuo Zhen’s backstage was the power of Hu Jintao’s propaganda department who promoted him to a propaganda position in Guangdong. Liu Yunshan, the current Propaganda Minister of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and a leader of the Youth League, who was “known as” the mortal enemy of the press, has always been a close confidant of Hu Jintao. Tuo Zhen’s current backstage is his trust in Hu Chunhua, secretary of the Guangdong Provincial Party Committee and Hu Jintao’s preferred “sixth generation leader.”
As the old saying goes: “Birds of a feather flock together, people divide into groups.” Tuo Zhen is highly consistent in philosophy with Liu Yunshan, Hu Chunhua, and Hu Jintao. They fanatically worship Mao Zedong, believe in totalitarian dictatorship in their bones, and have a natural and deep-seated hatred for all “liberalization” . Tuo Zhen was indifferent to others, but his passionate embrace of Hu Chunhua was definitely not impulsive or accidental.
Observers must not ignore that the background of Tuo Zhen’s rampant and extraordinarily perverse behavior is the recent administration of Guangdong by Hu Chunhua, the “prince” of the Hu Tuan faction: with the arrival of Hu Chunhua, the human rights situation in Guangdong has deteriorated sharply, the media’s space for speech has shrunk significantly, and a turmoil has set off across the province. Catch the countercurrent of dissident rights activists. Upon closer inspection, it is not difficult to find that wherever Hu Jintao’s beloved generals Hu Chunhua, Liu Qibao, and Zhang Qingli go, they are particularly authoritarian and dark. Political commentator Mr. Zhu Jianguo said that Hu Chunhua is more enlightened than Wang Yang on the basis that Wang Yang wears a Chinese tunic suit and Hu Chunhua wears a suit. This is really putting the cart before the horse. Facts have proved that although Wang Yang’s economic philosophy of “vacating the cage and replacing the birds” is wrong, he is much more open-minded politically than Hu Chunhua. This is also the main reason why Wang Yang was not promoted by Hu Jintao to become a member of the permanent membership.
Tuo Zhen’s continuous attacks on the public opinion of Xi Jinping’s “Southern Tour” reflect that Hu Jintao’s die-hard forces are trying their best to prevent the enlightened “Southern” media from cheering for Xi Jinping’s restart of reforms (reforms), in order to prevent “Xi Jinping’s Southern Tour” from forming a “Deng Xiaoping” The “Southern Tour”-style effect, the insidiousness and subtlety of this political magic, bear the distinct imprint of Hu Jintao.
Hu Jintao, Liu Yunshan, Hu Chunhua, and Tuo Zhen also took advantage of the hatred of corrupt officials towards Xi Jinping’s anti-corruption campaign to launch a crazy counterattack against Xi Jinping. At the same time, Hu Jintao, who had always been low-key in the ten years before the 18th National Congress, suddenly became extremely high-profile, and faced the The last known president of the country is walking around the country giving zombie speeches like a paralyzed counselor, bent on stealing Xi Jinping’s limelight and giving support to die-hard corrupt officials.
At the same time, Liu Yunshan presided over the Hu Ji Propaganda Department and took advantage of Xi Jinping’s concerns about the “disorder” and loss of control of online anti-corruption. He urgently stopped the online anti-corruption nationwide and blocked the fermentation of the “Southern Zhou” incident. The next step was to immediately launch a massive counterattack against Xi Jinping’s line. ——This kind of seizing on Xi Jinping’s shortcomings makes Xi Jinping very shrewd and insidious.
The Hu Tuan faction repeated its old tactics. On January 4, the Propaganda Department ordered the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology to shut down the Yanhuang Chunqiu website. In fact, as early as August 30, 2010, the registration number of Yanhuang Chunqiu was canceled. The person in power at the time was Hu Jintao. He chose this time to suddenly shut down the “Yanhuang Chunqiu” website with the obvious intention of cracking down on the liberal faction within the party who supported Xi Jinping’s reforms, and by the way, framed Xi Jinping. Pretending to be framed by his grandson was Hu Jintao’s usual trick.
Hu Jintao’s purpose in overthrowing Xi is to sideline Xi Jinping and allow Hu Chunhua to take office early.
Zhang Guotang, Zhou Yahui and others, while praising Hu Jintao, closed their eyes and insisted that Xi Jinping was a “Maoist leftist”. However, Tuo Zhen’s gritted attack on Xi Jinping once again proved from the negative side that Xi Jinping is by no means a die-hard and is sincerely promoting the CCP’s independence. An enlightened reformist leader, his reformist New Deal was frantically obstructed and counterattacked by Hu Jintao’s diehard forces, and his ruling status was seriously threatened.
Faced with this situation, in his recent speech at the Party School, Xi Jinping not only praised the need for new breakthroughs in reform and opening up, but also said: we cannot look at problems in isolation from the sixty-year history of the founding of the country, referring to the “reforms” of more than thirty years in the post-Mao era. “Opening up” is not fundamentally opposed to the Mao Zedong era, and disasters such as Mao’s Cultural Revolution were mistakes made by the Chinese Communist Party in its exploration. This is his strategic move to try to stabilize the die-hards. If stabilizing the die-hards is to accumulate strength and take next steps against the die-hards, this is a wise choice; but if he wants to use this to please the die-hards and seek to gain “power” within the party, Harmony” would be a big mistake.
Regarding unity within the party, Mao Zedong once said: “Seek unity in struggle, and unity will exist; seek unity in compromise, and unity will perish.” This statement is absurd and barbaric in a constitutional democratic country, but it is true in a totalitarian party. The absolute truth.
Therefore, Xi Jinping must severely punish Tuo Zhen and his gang in the next step, otherwise it will not be enough to establish his authority! If even Tuo Zhen, a propaganda stick at the provincial and ministerial level, can publicly insult and attack the country’s top leaders at will without any punishment, who will take Xi Jinping seriously in the future? If this happens, Xi Jinping will surely lose his prestige soon, and it will really come true to the clamor of the gang of villains such as Tuo Zhen, “It will be great if he can do it for five years!”
Machiavelli pointed out in “The Prince”: If rulers are universally hated, their rule can still be maintained (such as through terror, division and disintegration of opponents, etc.), but if rulers are universally despised, their rule can be maintained. Must fall.
If politicians want to make a difference, they must first retain power. In order to consolidate power, Jiang Zemin dared to bring down the “June Fourth Movement” “hero” Chen Xitong; in order to seize power, Hu Jintao also dared to bring down Chen Liangyu, who did not take him seriously; now What does it mean for you, Xi Jinping, to catch Tuo Zhen? Let me tell you the truth: Xi Jinping severely punishes Tuo Zhen and several corrupt officials involved in Hu Jintao propaganda, once again vigorously promotes the “anti-corruption” of domestic media networks, and leads the “anti-corruption storm” to Hu Jintao’s die-hard group, then the political opponents hated by hundreds of millions of people will soon become powerful After collapse, Liu Yunshan, Hu Chunhua and their gang had no choice but to surrender and obey orders!
In terms of the balance of power, Xi Jinping must now promote the enlightenment of the Internet and media, because Hu Jintao and his group have used North Korea and Cuba-style totalitarian regressive politics to protect the privileged vested interests of the corrupt officials, party sticks and murderers, and have won the favor of all officials in the past ten years; If Xi Jinping wants to change the balance of power, he must learn from Deng Xiaoping’s use of the Wall of Democracy to overthrow Hua Guofeng: unite the liberals and intellectual elites inside and outside the party, appease the rights-defending people, and launch a bottom-up offensive against the diehard forces.
Zeng Jieming (Deputy Secretary-General of the Chinese Social Democratic Party) Written on January 6, 2013 in Bingxue New York State